Quantification of Soil Water Competition and Compensation Using Soil Water Differences between Strips of Intercropping

被引:25
作者
Chen H. [1 ,2 ]
Qin A. [3 ]
Chai Q. [1 ]
Gan Y. [4 ]
Liu Z. [3 ]
机构
[1] Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou
[2] Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang
[3] Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang
[4] Agriculture and Agri–Food Canada, Swift Current, S9H 3X2, SK
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Intercrops; Root zone; Soil water recharge; Water uptake;
D O I
10.1007/s40003-014-0134-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Synergistic regulation on water competition and compensation is critical to effective use of water for sustainable intercropping systems in arid areas. Field experiment was carried out in 2009, 2010, and 2011 in Hexi Corridor, northwest China. Two late-sown crops [maize (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max)] intercropping with three early-sown crops [pea (Pisum sativum), rape (Brassia campestris), and wheat (Triticum aestivum)] were designed in comparison with the respective sole crops. Differences in soil water (soil water of late-sown crops minus that of early-sown crops in intercropping) were found to be mostly positive during the co-growth period which changed to negative during the fallow period of early-sown crops. Absolute values of the difference between wheat and maize strips both in co-growth and fallow period were the greatest among treatments, followed by maize–pea intercropping, while they were lowest in soybean–wheat intercropping in 2009 and 2010 and in maize–rape intercropping in 2011. In the co-growth period, the mean soil water competition for wheat strips in maize–wheat intercropping across 3 years was 71 mm, while it was 16 mm and 27 mm, respectively, for maize–rape and maize–pea intercropping. Sole wheat recharged the greatest amount of soil water from wheat harvest to maize harvest. In each year, intercropped wheat, rape, and pea recharged 24–76, 42–67, and 32–49 mm soil water, respectively. It was concluded that the methodology to calculate soil water competition and compensation was a very useful tool for evaluating the amount of soil water movement in intercropping systems. © 2014, NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Sciences).
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 330
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Adiku S., Oizer-Lafontaine H., Bajazet T., Patterns of root growth and water uptake of a maize-cowpea mixture grown under greenhouse conditions, Plant Soil, 235, pp. 85-94, (2001)
[2]  
Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M., Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirement. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. FAO, Rome, pp. 1-39, (1998)
[3]  
Baker J.M., Van Bavel C.H.M., Water transfer through cotton plants connecting soil regions of differing water potential, Agron J, 80, pp. 993-997, (1988)
[4]  
Bates L.M., Hall A.E., Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in bulk leaf water status, Oecologia, 50, pp. 62-65, (1981)
[5]  
Blum A., Effective use of water (EUW) and not water–use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress, Field Crops Res, 112, pp. 119-123, (2009)
[6]  
Brooker R.W., Plant–plant interactions and environmental change, New Phytol, 171, pp. 271-284, (2006)
[7]  
Caballero R., Goicoechea E.L., Hernaiz P.J., Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of common vetch, Field Crops Res, 41, pp. 135-140, (1995)
[8]  
Chai Q., Qin A.Z., Gan Y.T., Yu A.Z., Higher yield and lower carbon emission by intercropping maize with rape, pea, and wheat in arid irrigation areas, Agron Sustain Dev., 26, pp. 1-9, (2013)
[9]  
Fan Z.L., Chai Q., Huang G.B., Yu A.Z., Huang P., Yang C.H., Tao Z.Q., Liu H.L., Yield and water consumption characteristics of wheat/maize intercropping with reduced tillage in an oasis region, Eur J Agron, 45, pp. 52-58, (2013)
[10]  
Soil map of the world: Revised legend. FAO, Rome, (1988)