Machine learning prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Chayakrit Krittanawong
Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk
Sripal Bangalore
Zhen Wang
Kipp W. Johnson
Rachel Pinotti
HongJu Zhang
Scott Kaplin
Bharat Narasimhan
Takeshi Kitai
Usman Baber
Jonathan L. Halperin
W. H. Wilson Tang
机构
[1] Baylor College of Medicine,Section of Cardiology
[2] Case Western Reserve University,Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute
[3] University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center,Department of Cardiovascular Diseases
[4] New York University School of Medicine,Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research
[5] Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery,Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences
[6] Mayo Clinic,Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
[7] Institute for Next Generation Healthcare,Department of Cardiovascular Diseases
[8] Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute
[9] Levy Library,undefined
[10] Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,undefined
[11] Mayo Clinic,undefined
[12] Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,undefined
[13] Mount Sinai Hospital,undefined
[14] Mount Sinai Heart,undefined
[15] Cleveland Clinic,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 10卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly utilized for cardiovascular disease prediction. We aim to assess and summarize the overall predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases. A comprehensive search strategy was designed and executed within the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception through March 15, 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of the predictive ability of ML algorithms of coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and cardiac arrhythmias. Of 344 total studies identified, 103 cohorts, with a total of 3,377,318 individuals, met our inclusion criteria. For the prediction of coronary artery disease, boosting algorithms had a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.91), and custom-built algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85–0.97). For the prediction of stroke, support vector machine (SVM) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81–0.97), boosting algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.81–0.96), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms had a pooled AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83–0.95). Although inadequate studies for each algorithm for meta-analytic methodology for both heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias because the confidence intervals overlap between different methods, showing no difference, SVM may outperform other algorithms in these areas. The predictive ability of ML algorithms in cardiovascular diseases is promising, particularly SVM and boosting algorithms. However, there is heterogeneity among ML algorithms in terms of multiple parameters. This information may assist clinicians in how to interpret data and implement optimal algorithms for their dataset.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Noble WS(2004)Support vector machine applications in computational biology Kernel Methods Comput. Biol. 71 92-582
[2]  
Aruna S(2011)A novel SVM based CSSFFS feature selection algorithm for detecting breast cancer Int. J. Comput. Appl. 31 20-896
[3]  
Rajagopalan S(2017)Deep learning at chest radiography: Automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks Radiology 284 574-2073
[4]  
Lakhani P(2018)Deep learning with convolutional neural network for differentiation of liver masses at dynamic contrast-enhanced CT: A preliminary study Radiology 286 887-2664
[5]  
Sundaram B(2019)Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: A practical primer Eur. Heart J. 40 2058-2884
[6]  
Yasaka K(2017)Artificial intelligence in precision cardiovascular medicine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 69 2657-2012
[7]  
Akai H(2018)Future direction for using artificial intelligence to predict and manage hypertension Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 20 75-1847
[8]  
Krittanawong C(2001)A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations Stat. Med. 20 2865-2959
[9]  
Johnson KW(2000)Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group JAMA 283 2008-1003
[10]  
Rosenson RS(1998)Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories Circulation 97 1837-1482