Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases

被引:0
作者
Shengdar Q. Tsai
J. Keith Joung
机构
[1] Molecular Pathology Unit,USA; and the Department of Pathology
[2] Center for Cancer Research,and the Department of Pathology
[3] and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology,undefined
[4] Massachusetts General Hospital,undefined
[5] 149 13th Street,undefined
[6] Charlestown,undefined
[7] Massachusetts 02129,undefined
[8] Harvard Medical School,undefined
[9] Boston,undefined
[10] Massachusetts 02115,undefined
[11] USA.,undefined
[12] Harvard Medical School,undefined
[13] Boston,undefined
[14] Massachusetts 02115,undefined
[15] USA.,undefined
来源
Nature Reviews Genetics | 2016年 / 17卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Wild-type CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases can induce high-frequency mutations at unintended off-target sites.Methods for defining genome-wide specificities of CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases include cell-based methods such as integrase-defective lentiviral vector (IDLV) capture, genome-wide unbiased identification of DSBs enabled by sequencing (GUIDE-seq), high-throughput genome-wide translocation sequencing (HTGTS), and breaks labelling, enrichment on streptavidin and next-generation sequencing (BLESS), and in vitro methods such as digested genome sequencing (Digenome-seq).Methods for improving genome-wide specificity include truncated guide RNAs (tru-gRNAs), extended gRNAs, paired Cas9 nickases (Cas9n), dimeric RNA-guided FokI–dCas9 ('dead' Cas9) nucleases (RFNs) and engineered variants with reduced non-specific protein–DNA interactions.For many research applications, simple controls (such as the use of multiple gRNAs) and/or genetic reversion or complementation experiments, may help to exclude the possibility of confounding off-target effects.For therapeutic applications, it will be important to carefully define even low-frequency off-target effects using sensitive, unbiased genome-wide methods.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 312
页数:12
相关论文
共 186 条
  • [1] Doetschman T(1987)Targeted correction of a mutant Nature 330 576-578
  • [2] Thomas KR(1987) gene in mouse embryonic stem cells Cell 51 503-512
  • [3] Capecchi MR(1981)Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells Nature 292 154-156
  • [4] Evans MJ(1994)Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 8096-8106
  • [5] Kaufman MH(2011)Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease Curr. Gene Ther. 11 11-27
  • [6] Rouet P(2010)Meganucleases and other tools for targeted genome engineering: perspectives and challenges for gene therapy Nature 11 636-646
  • [7] Smih F(2014)Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases Nat. Biotechnol. 32 347-355
  • [8] Jasin M(2014)CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes Cell 157 1262-1278
  • [9] Silva G(2014)Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering Science 346 1258096-1160
  • [10] Urnov FD(1996)Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93 1156-6325