Index of microvascular resistance and outcomes following intra-coronary thrombolysis with percutaneous intervention in STEMI: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials

被引:0
作者
Ashish Kumar
Mariam Shariff
Rajkumar Doshi
机构
[1] St John’s Medical College Hospital,Department of Critical Care Medicine
[2] University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine,Department of Internal Medicine
来源
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | 2020年 / 49卷
关键词
Intra-coronary thrombolysis; Microvascular obstruction; Index of microvascular resistance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Microvascular obstruction following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is highly prevalent and independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Microvascular obstruction is determined by index of the microvascular resistance. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of all published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) studying the effect of intra-coronary thrombolysis with PCI as compared to standard treatment among patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction. We included 6 RCTs summing up to 947 patients in the final analysis. Intra-coronary thrombolysis resulted in significantly lower index of microvascular resistance [standardized mean difference: − 13.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): − 16.74 to − 10.73, P value < 0.001, I2 = 0%]. There was no difference noted in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events with intra-coronary thrombolysis as compared to standard treatment [Odds ratio:  0.71, 95% CI: 0.46–1.08, P value = 0.11,  I2 = 0%]. The absence of heterogeneity deferred us from using dose–response analysis to account for altering dose used across studies. The results of the present meta-analysis highlights the role of intra-coronary thrombolysis in reducing microvascular obstruction. No effect of intra-coronary thrombolysis was noted on the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 491
页数:4
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Roth GA(2018)Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2013;2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 Lancet 392 1736-1788
  • [2] Abate D(1998)Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction Circulation 97 765-772
  • [3] Abate KH(2002)Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction Eur Heart J 23 1112-1117
  • [4] WK C(2017)Relationship between microvascular obstruction and adverse events following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an individual patient data pooled analysis from seven randomized trials Eur Heart J 38 3502-3510
  • [5] A. ZE MJR(2012)Intracoronary abciximab and aspiration thrombectomy in patients with large anterior myocardial infarction: the INFUSE-AMI randomized trial Abciximab and Aspiration Thrombectomy JAMA 307 1817-1826
  • [6] Henriques JPS(2019)Effect of low-dose intracoronary alteplase during primary percutaneous coronary intervention on microvascular obstruction in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial JAMA 321 56-68
  • [7] Zijlstra F(2006)Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial Lancet 367 569-578
  • [8] Ottervanger JP(2019)Comparison of myocardial microcirculatory perfusion after catheter-administered intracoronary thrombolysis with anisodamine versus standard thrombus aspiration in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93 839-845
  • [9] de Waha S(2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration BMJ 339 b2700-1834
  • [10] Patel MR(2007)Intracoronary streptokinase after primary percutaneous coronary intervention N Engl J Med 356 1823-1071