Integrated approach for the molecular characterization of edited plants obtained via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer

被引:0
作者
Lorenza Dalla Costa
Daniela Vinciguerra
Lisa Giacomelli
Umberto Salvagnin
Stefano Piazza
Katia Spinella
Mickael Malnoy
Claudio Moser
Ugo Marchesi
机构
[1] Fondazione Edmund Mach,Research and Innovation Centre
[2] Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana “M. Aleandri” Centro di Referenza Nazionale per la Ricerca di Organismi Geneticamente Modificati (CROGM),undefined
来源
European Food Research and Technology | 2022年 / 248卷
关键词
GMO; Genome editing; Copy number quantification; qPCR; ddPCR; NGS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer—actually the most used method to engineer plants—may lead to integration of multiple copies of T-DNA in the plant genome, as well as to chimeric tissues composed of modified cells and wild type cells. A molecular characterization of the transformed lines is thus a good practice to select the best ones for further investigation. Nowadays, several quantitative and semi-quantitative techniques are available to estimate the copy number (CN) of the T-DNA in genetically modified plants. In this study, we compared three methods based on (1) real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), (2) droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and (3) next generation sequencing (NGS), to carry out a molecular characterization of grapevine edited lines. These lines contain a knock-out mutation, obtained via CRISPR/Cas9 technology, in genes involved in plant susceptibility to two important mildew diseases of grapevine. According to our results, qPCR and ddPCR outputs are largely in agreement in terms of accuracy, especially for low CN values, while ddPCR resulted more precise than qPCR. With regard to the NGS analysis, the CNs detected with this method were often not consistent with those calculated by qPCR and ddPCR, and NGS was not able to discriminate the integration points in three out of ten lines. Nevertheless, the NGS method can positively identify T-DNA truncations or the presence of tandem/inverted repeats, providing distinct and relevant information about the transgene integration asset. Moreover, the expression analysis of Cas9 and single guide RNA (sgRNA), and the sequencing of the target site added new information to be related to CN data. This work, by reporting a practical case-study on grapevine edited lines, explores pros and cons of the most advanced diagnostic techniques available for the precocious selection of the proper transgenic material. The results may be of interest both to scientists developing new transgenic lines, and to laboratories in charge of GMO control.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 299
页数:10
相关论文
共 158 条
  • [1] Menz J(2020)Genome edited crops touch the market: a view on the global development and regulatory environment Front Plant Sci 11 586027-7
  • [2] Modrzejewski D(2018)With a free pass, CRISPR-edited plants reach market in record time Nat Biotechnol 36 6-134
  • [3] Hartung F(2020)Strategies to produce T-DNA free CRISPRed fruit trees via Sci Rep 10 20155-1828
  • [4] Waltz E(2020) stable gene transfer Plant Biotechnol J 9 1957-2677
  • [5] Dalla Costa L(2019)Reduced fire blight susceptibility in apple cultivars using a high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-FLP/FRT-based gene editing system Front Plant Sci 526 129-305
  • [6] Piazza S(2009)DNA-Free genome editing: past, present and future Methods Mol Biol Transgenic Maize 56 1818-864
  • [7] Pompili V(2008)Determination of transgene copy number J Agric Food Chem 57 2668-78
  • [8] Pompili V(2009)Development of a real-time PCR method for the differential detection and quantification of four solanaceae in GMO analysis: Potato (Solanum tuberosum), Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), Eggplant (Solanum melongena), and Pepper ( J Agric Food Chem 10 53-1783
  • [9] Dalla Costa L(2010)) BMC Biotechnol 54 291-200
  • [10] Piazza S(2016)Elaboration of a reliable strategy based on real-time PCR to characterize genetically modified plantlets and to evaluate the efficiency of a marker gene removal in grape ( Biochem Genet 25 855-702