Teaching, Learning and Governance in Science Education and Physical Education: A Comparative Approach

被引:1
作者
Östman L. [1 ]
Öhman M. [2 ]
Lundqvist E. [1 ]
Lidar M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Education, Uppsala University, Uppsala
[2] School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro
关键词
Comparative didactics; Governance; Learning; Power; Teaching;
D O I
10.1007/s10780-015-9268-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Teaching, learning and motivation are the major concerns for educators. In this article we approach these issues from a Foucauldian power and governance perspective in order to understand that attention is drawn to certain knowledge and values and not others that would be equally possible in a teaching practice. The approach suggests that the relationship between teachers’ governance and students’ freedom to govern themselves is something that is construed simultaneously in the teaching and learning of specific subject content. This interconnection is illustrated by two teaching sequences, one from science education and one from physical education. By comparing the two teaching sequences it is possible to identify differences and/or similarities between how the relationship between governance and self-governance is staged and thereby which companion meanings are offered. The desirable actions manifested in the teaching practices include which subject knowledge the students should learn, how students ought to act and the kind of people they ought to be. It is shown that self-governance leads to normative patterns in which the good student is constituted as a responsible, self-disciplined, active, thinking and judging individual. This can be seen as an expression of intensified student participation connected to the increasing individualisation in late liberal society, where people in their daily lives are forced to take sides, reflect, participate and make choices. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 386
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Burchell G., Gordon C., Miller P., The Foucault effect studies in governmentality, (1991)
[2]  
Cherryholmes C.H., Power and criticism. Poststructural investigations in education, (1998)
[3]  
Jackson P.W., Life in classooms, (1968)
[4]  
Lemke J., Talking science: Language, learning, and values, (1990)
[5]  
Lidar M., Lundqvist E., Ostman L., Teaching and learning in the science classroom. The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology, Science Education, 90, 1, pp. 148-163, (2006)
[6]  
Lundqvist E., Almqvist J., Ostman L., Epistemological norms and companion meanings in science classroom communication, Science Education, 93, pp. 859-874, (2009)
[7]  
Lundqvist E., Almqvist J., Ostman L., Institutional traditions in teachers’ manners of teaching, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, pp. 111-127, (2012)
[8]  
Lundqvist E., Ostman L., Att undersöka NO-undervisningens normativitet: Epistemologiska normer och följemeningar i samspelet mellan lärare och elever. [To investigate the normativity of science education: Epistemological norms and companion meanings in the interplay between teachers and students], Journal of Nordic Educational Research, 29, pp. 261-278, (2009)
[9]  
Ohman M., Kropp och makt i rörelse [Body and power in motion]. Örebro, Örebro University, Orebro Studies in Sociology, (2007)
[10]  
Ohman M., Analysing the direction of socialisation from a power perspective, Sport, Education and Society, 15, 4, pp. 393-409, (2010)