GPS-ZTD data assimilation and its impact on wintertime haze prediction over North China Plain using WRF 3DVAR and CMAQ modeling system

被引:0
作者
Lina Gao
Zhiquan Liu
Dan Chen
Peng Yan
Yong Zhang
Heng Hu
Hong Liang
Xudong Liang
机构
[1] China Meteorological Administration,Meteorological Observation Center
[2] Chinese Academy of Meteorological Science,State Key Laboratory of Sever Weather
[3] National Center for Atmospheric Research,Institute of Urban Meteorology
[4] China Meteorological Administration,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2021年 / 28卷
关键词
WRF-3DVAR; CMAQ; Aerosol; Visibility; Relative humidity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Severe haze frequently hits the North China Plain (NCP), especially in winter during recent years. Meteorological factors affect aerosol formation and its optical properties, and accurate meteorological fields are imperative for accurate aerosol simulations. The impacts of Global Positioning System Zenith Total Delay (GPS-ZTD) data assimilation on meteorology and aerosol simulations were evaluated in this study using the WRF-CMAQ (the Weather Research and Forecasting model and Community Multiscale Air Quality) modelling system over the NCP during 01–31 December 2019. After bias correction, GSP-ZTD data were assimilated into the WRF model using the 3DVAR technique. Two sensitivity tests (CTR and ZTD) were conducted. The WRF model had generally acceptable performance for surface and upper air meteorological variables, PM2.5 and visibility. From the aspect of BIAS, STDE, RMSE, and R, the assimilation of ZTD data improved the underestimation of ground relative humidity (RH). The improvement was more pronounced in the first 18 forecast hours. The mean RH BIAS decreased by 8%. Surface pressure was also improved in ZTD. The influence of ZTD data assimilation on ground temperature and wind tended to be neutral. The BIAS of ZTD decreased by 3% after data assimilation while STED or RMSE increased slightly. After ZTD data assimilation, the PM2.5 underestimation decreased by 3.4% over NCP. And station mean BIAS or RMSE of PM2.5 decreased at more than 70% stations. After ZTD data assimilation, the visibility overestimation was reduced by 2.5%. And more than 81% stations over had lower visibility BIAS or RMSE. Station mean PM2.5 mass concentration increased by 1.5% in ZTD. The primary aerosol species increased by approximately 1%, and most secondary aerosol species increased by greater than 2% affected by both aerosol physical and chemical process. Although the improvement of PM2.5 seems marginal from the perspective of regional or temporal average, the contribution of ZTD data assimilation on specific pollution episodes at specific stations can be great. The improvement of PM2.5 troughs was in the range of 1–5 μg/m3, while the overestimation of PM2.5 peaks was reduced by few up to dozens μg/m3. This will contribute to the extreme value prediction during pollution episode.
引用
收藏
页码:68523 / 68538
页数:15
相关论文
共 390 条
[1]  
An Z(2019)Sever haze in north China: a synergy of anthropogenic emissions and atmospheric process PNAS 116 8657-8666
[2]  
Huang R-J(2013)Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0.1 Geosci Model Dev 6 883-899
[3]  
Zhang R(2016)Variational bias correction of GNSS ZTD in the HARMONIE modeling system J Appl Meteorol Climatol 55 1259-1275
[4]  
Tie X(2004)A three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) data assimilation system for MM5. Implementation and initial results Mon Weather Rev 132 897-914
[5]  
Li G(2012)The weather research and forecasting model’s community variational/ensemble data assimilation system: WRFDA BMAS doi 93 831-843
[6]  
Cao J(1983)Atmospheric equilibrium models for sulfate and nitrate aerosols Atmos Environ 17 2237-2252
[7]  
Zhou W(2012)Operational assimilation of GPS zenith total delay observation into the Met Office numerical weather prediction models Mon Weather Rev 140 2706-2719
[8]  
Shi Z(2009)Sensitivity of aerosol optical thickness and aerosol direct radiative effect to relative humidity Atmos Chem Phys 9 2375-2386
[9]  
Han Y(2011)Intercomparison of humidity and temperature sensors: GTS1, Vaisala RS80, and CFH Adv Atmos Sci 28 139-146
[10]  
Gu Z(1995)The regional particulate matter model 1 Model description and preliminary results J Geophys Res 100 26191-16209