Consumer Perceptions of the Social Vs. Environmental Dimensions of Sustainability

被引:64
作者
Catlin J.R. [1 ]
Luchs M.G. [2 ]
Phipps M. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Business Administration, California State University, Sacramento, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, 95819, CA
[2] College of William & Mary, 101 Ukrop Way, Williamsburg, 23185, VA
[3] University of Melbourne, 198 Berkeley Street, Melbourne, 3010, VIC
关键词
Choice; Environmental; Mixed methods; Policy communication; Social; Sustainability;
D O I
10.1007/s10603-017-9356-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prior research on sustainable consumption has addressed a variety of issues yet is characterized by mixed results. Researchers have often treated sustainability as a uni-dimensional construct, overlooking important differences and thwarting a better understanding of consumer response. We demonstrate that consumers perceive the social and environmental dimensions of sustainability as psychologically distinct in theoretically and practically important ways. Specifically, consumers associate the social dimension of sustainability more with affective, short-term, and local considerations and the environmental dimension more with cognitive, long-term, and global considerations. We identify and explore these distinctions in a qualitative pilot study, which subsequently motivated development of three hypotheses. We provide evidence supporting these hypotheses in a series of five studies. Our findings enable a reinterpretation of prior equivocal research, serve as a foundation for future research, and provide guidance for how policy-makers can tailor policy and related communication efforts depending on whether the focal issue is related to social versus environmental concerns. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 277
页数:32
相关论文
共 68 条
[61]  
Vallacher R.R., Wegner D.M., Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, pp. 660-671, (1989)
[62]  
Wang J., Lee A.Y., The role of regulatory focus in preference construction, Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 1, pp. 28-38, (2006)
[63]  
White K., Simpson B., When do (and don’t) normative appeals impact sustainable consumer behaviors?, Journal of Marketing, 77, pp. 77-95, (2013)
[64]  
White K., MacDonnell R., Dahl D.W., It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors, Journal of Marketing Research, 48, pp. 472-485, (2011)
[65]  
White K., MacDonnell R., Ellard J.H., Belief in a just world: Consumer intentions and behaviors towards ethical products, Journal of Marketing, 76, pp. 103-118, (2012)
[66]  
Yan D., Future events are far away: Exploring the distance-on-distance effect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, pp. 514-525, (2014)
[67]  
Yang D., Lu Y., Zhu W., Su C., Going green: How different advertising appeals impact green consumption behavior, Journal of Business Research, 68, 12, pp. 2663-2675, (2015)
[68]  
Zajonc R.B., Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences, American Psychologist, 35, pp. 151-175, (1980)