Consumer Perceptions of the Social Vs. Environmental Dimensions of Sustainability

被引:62
作者
Catlin J.R. [1 ]
Luchs M.G. [2 ]
Phipps M. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Business Administration, California State University, Sacramento, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, 95819, CA
[2] College of William & Mary, 101 Ukrop Way, Williamsburg, 23185, VA
[3] University of Melbourne, 198 Berkeley Street, Melbourne, 3010, VIC
关键词
Choice; Environmental; Mixed methods; Policy communication; Social; Sustainability;
D O I
10.1007/s10603-017-9356-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prior research on sustainable consumption has addressed a variety of issues yet is characterized by mixed results. Researchers have often treated sustainability as a uni-dimensional construct, overlooking important differences and thwarting a better understanding of consumer response. We demonstrate that consumers perceive the social and environmental dimensions of sustainability as psychologically distinct in theoretically and practically important ways. Specifically, consumers associate the social dimension of sustainability more with affective, short-term, and local considerations and the environmental dimension more with cognitive, long-term, and global considerations. We identify and explore these distinctions in a qualitative pilot study, which subsequently motivated development of three hypotheses. We provide evidence supporting these hypotheses in a series of five studies. Our findings enable a reinterpretation of prior equivocal research, serve as a foundation for future research, and provide guidance for how policy-makers can tailor policy and related communication efforts depending on whether the focal issue is related to social versus environmental concerns. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 277
页数:32
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Aaker J.L., Dimensions of brand personality, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 3, pp. 347-356, (1997)
[2]  
Albers-Miller N., Stafford M., An international analysis of emotional and rational appeals in services vs goods advertising, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16, pp. 42-57, (1999)
[3]  
Arnould E.J., Plastina A., Ball D., Does fair trade deliver on its core value proposition? Effects on income, educational attainment, and health in three countries, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28, 2, pp. 186-201, (2009)
[4]  
Austgulen M., Environmentally sustainable meat consumption: An analysis of the Norwegian public debate, Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 1, pp. 45-66, (2014)
[5]  
Bergadaa M.M., The role of time in the action of the consumer, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, pp. 289-302, (1990)
[6]  
Bostrom M., Micheletti M., Introducing the sustainability challenge of textiles and clothing, Journal of Consumer Policy, 39, pp. 367-375, (2016)
[7]  
Cesario J., Grant H., Higgins E.T., Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 3, pp. 388-404, (2004)
[8]  
Chabowski B.R., Mena J.A., Gonzalez-Padron T.L., The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: A basis for future research opportunities, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 1, pp. 55-70, (2011)
[9]  
Choi S., Ng A., Environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability and price effects on consumer responses, Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 2, pp. 269-282, (2011)
[10]  
Claudy M.C., Peterson M., Understanding the underutilization of urban bicycle commuting: A behavioral reasoning perspective, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 33, 2, pp. 173-187, (2014)