Chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer in Japan

被引:0
作者
Narikazu Boku
机构
[1] Shizuoka Cancer Center,Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology
来源
International Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008年 / 13卷
关键词
gastric cancer; chemotherapy; clinical trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Until the 1990s, there were no chemotherapy regimens with old-generation anticancer agents showing a survival benefit over 5-fluorouracil (FU) alone, and standard chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer had not been established. In the late 1990s, several new active agents were developed and some phase III trials with these agents were conducted; the new agent S-1 showed noninferiority to 5-FU in these trials. S-1 plus cisplatin is the first doublet chemotherapy to have shown a survival benefit over monotherapy with S-1. It has been demonstrated that capecitabine and oxaliplatin (OHP) can replace 5-FU and cisplatin (CDDP), offering more convenient treatment options. Thus, combination chemotherapy with an oral fluoropyrimidine (S-1 or capecitabine) and platinum (CDDP or OHP) has been recognized as standard chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer all over the world. However, it can be said that none of these new combination chemotherapies have shown remarkable progress from 5-FU plus cisplatin regimens. It is expected that triplet chemotherapy with a taxane; the use of molecular targeting agents; and the establishment of treatment strategies including second line chemotherapy, will lead to remarkable progress in personalized medicine in the near future.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Parkin D.M.(2005)Global cancer statistics, 2002 CA Cancer J Clin 55 74-108
[2]  
Bray F.(1993)Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer Cancer 72 37-41
[3]  
Ferlay J.(1994)Initial or delayed chemotherapy with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer Ann Oncol 5 189-190
[4]  
Murad A.M.(1995)Randomized comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus best supportive care alone in patients with nonresectable gastric cancer Br J Cancer 71 587-591
[5]  
Santiago F.F.(1985)A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma. Fluorouracil versus fluorouracil and doxorubicin versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin JAMA 253 2061-2067
[6]  
Petroianu A.(1991)Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil, combined with doxorubicin: a step ahead in the treatment of gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group J Clin Oncol 9 827-831
[7]  
Glimelius B.(1992)FAMTX versus etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin: a randomized trial in gastric cancer J Clin Oncol 10 541-548
[8]  
Hoffmann K.(1993)A phase III randomized study of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer Cancer 71 3813-3918
[9]  
Haglund U.(1994)Controlled evaluation of three drug combination regimen versus fluorouracil alone in the therapy of advanced gastric cancer J Clin Oncol 12 412-416
[10]  
Pyrhonen S.(1997)Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer J Clin Oncol 15 261-267