Design and standardisation of XBRL solutions for governance and transparency

被引:23
作者
Debreceny R. [1 ]
Piechocki M. [1 ]
Felden C. [1 ]
Gräning A. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Hawaìi at Manoa, School of Accountancy, Shidler College of Business, Honolulu, HI 96822
关键词
Disclosure; Metadata; Reporting value chain; Taxonomies; Transparency; XBRL;
D O I
10.1057/jdg.2009.9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) is an XML-based, de facto standard for the dissemination of metadata associated with business reporting information. The standard allows parties to build reporting solutions within a wide variety of information value chains. The standard provides considerable flexibility in the way those parties construct those services. The XBRL specification provides a framework upon which those that wish to develop an XBRL-based reporting environment then build. XBRL taxonomies provide metadata about reporting concepts. Instance documents, aligned with those taxonomies, report facts and provide entity-specific metadata. The XBRL specification constrains taxonomy design but within these constraints, developers have very wide discretion. This inherent flexibility creates challenges to information providers, intermediaries and consumers. Designers must balance flexibility, transparency, reliability and cost. We provide four XBRL use cases to illustrate these challenges. We further analyse these issues in a case study of the prudential supervision of financial institutions in Europe with the COREP framework. The COREP taxonomy was the first to employ the dimensional XBRL specification. The dimensional specification allows for the reporting of data in a hypercube modelled in a taxonomy. The hypercubes in the COREP taxonomy allow for breakdowns of solvency reporting into their constituent structures. The COREP hypercube structures are highly complex. Meeting objectives for flexibility, national prudential regulators are able to make national extensions to the foundational COREP taxonomy. As a result, we observe considerable national variation in calculation relationships and in dimensional structures. Radically different data models contribute to the inconsistencies among the various national taxonomies within the overall COREP framework. We show how this flexibility in multiple taxonomy design across different European countries has created challenges for information providers and difficulties for information consumers seeking to assess institutions across national borders. We make recommendations on the balancing of needs for flexibility and data compatibility within taxonomy design. © 2009 Palgrave Macmillan.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 240
页数:16
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Debreceny R., Gray G.L., The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2, pp. 47-74, (2001)
[2]  
New Dimensions for Business Reporting and XBRL, (2007)
[3]  
Williams S.P., Scifl eet P.A., Hardy C.A., Online business reporting: An information management perspective, International Journal of Information Management, 26, pp. 91-101, (2006)
[4]  
Kernan K., XBRL around the world, Journal of Accountancy, 206, pp. 62-66, (2008)
[5]  
XBRL in Action, (2008)
[6]  
Cohen E.E., Schiavina T., Servais O., XBRL: The standardised business language for 21st century reporting and governance, International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2, pp. 368-394, (2005)
[7]  
Piechocki M., Debreceny R.S., The Impact of XBRL on the Financial Reporting Value Chain, Information Systems Section, American Accounting Association, Mid-Year Meeting, (2009)
[8]  
Farrell J., Saloner G., Standardization, comparability and innovation, Rand Journal of Economics, 16, pp. 70-83, (1985)
[9]  
Choi J.P., Herd behavior, the 'penguin effect,' and the suppression of informational diffusion: An analysis of informational externalities and payoff interdependency, RAND Journal of Economics, 28, pp. 407-425, (1997)
[10]  
Farrell J., Saloner G., Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product pre-announcements, and predation, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 940-955, (1986)