Evaluation of the seismicity for the Marmara region with statistical approaches

被引:0
作者
Nilgun Sayil
机构
[1] Karadeniz Technical University,Department of Geophysics, Engineering Faculty
来源
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica | 2014年 / 49卷
关键词
Marmara region; Gutenberg Richter relationship; Maximum likelihood method; Poisson model; Seismicity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Marmara region has been divided into six sub-regions having regard to the certain seismotectonic characteristics of the region, to study the seismicity. For this, the data belonging to both the historical and instrumental period has been used. The probabilities of earthquake recurrences were obtained by using Poisson statistical distribution models. Gutenberg–Richter (GR) relationship for each sub-region has been computed and, a- and b-values known as seismic hazard scaling parameters have been determined by linear least square (LLS) method and maximum likelihood (ML) method. The highest and the lowest b\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$b$$\end{document}-values determined by LLS are found for sub-region 4 (Saros Gulf, 0.74±0.08\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$0.74\pm 0.08$$\end{document}) and sub-region 1 (Duzce, 0.56±0.06\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$0.56\pm 0.06$$\end{document}), respectively. The highest a\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$a$$\end{document}-value for sub-region 4 as 5.05±0.05\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$5.05\pm 0.05$$\end{document} and the lowest a\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$a$$\end{document}-value for sub-region 3 (Tekirdag) as 4.12±0.02\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$4.12\pm 0.02$$\end{document} are found. Likewise, the calculated lowest and highest b\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$b$$\end{document}-values with ML are 0.55±0.05\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$0.55\pm 0.05$$\end{document} for sub-region 1 and 0.68±0.07\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$0.68\pm 0.07$$\end{document} for sub-region 4, respectively. Also, b\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$b$$\end{document}-value for all region (108 years and MS≥4.0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{S}\ge 4.0$$\end{document}) are estimated as 0.71±0.03\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$0.71\pm 0.03$$\end{document} with LLS and 0.65±0.02\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$0.65\pm 0.02$$\end{document} with ML. The highest earthquake occurrence probabilities of MS≥7.0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{S} \ge 7.0$$\end{document} in the next 100 years according to the Poisson distribution are found as 74.4 % for sub-region 1 (Duzce), 58.6 % for sub-region 2 (Izmit), 54.3 % for sub-region 3 (Tekirdag) and 49.7 % for sub-region 5 (Bandirma). The shortest recurrence period for the earthquake with the same magnitude is determined as 73 years for sub-region 1.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 281
页数:16
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Aki K(1965)Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula Bull Earthq Res Inst Tokyo Univ 43 237-239
[2]  
Al-Tarazia E(2007) and its confidence limits Earthq Spectra 23 1-19
[3]  
Sandvol E(2001)Alternative models of seismic hazard evaluation along the Jordan-Dead Sea transform Geophys J Int 145 471-485
[4]  
Ambraseys NN(2002)Reassesment of earthquakes 1900–1999 in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East Bull Seismol Soc Am 92 1-18
[5]  
Ambraseys NN(2002)The seismic activity of the Marmara region over the last 2000 years Terra Nova 14 80-86
[6]  
Armijo R(1992)Asymmetric slip partitioning in the sea of Marmara pull-apart: a clue to propagation processes of the North Anatolian Fault? Ann Tecton 5 164-195
[7]  
Meyer B(1997)The North Anatolian Fault zone Ann Geofis 4 587-610
[8]  
Navarro S(1966)Active tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean region deduced from GPS, neotectonic and seismicity data Phys Chem Earth 7 115-165
[9]  
King G(2001)Earthquake energie and magnitude Geophys Res Lett 28 2723-2726
[10]  
Barka AA(1977)How fast is rupture during an earthquake? New insights from the 1999 Turkey earthquakes Geophys Res Lett 4 91-94