A review of robotic surgical training: establishing a curriculum and credentialing process in ophthalmology

被引:0
作者
Bonnie He
Marc D. de Smet
Mohit Sodhi
Mahyar Etminan
David Maberley
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine
[2] University of Leiden,Department of Ophthalmology
来源
Eye | 2021年 / 35卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ophthalmic surgery requires a highly dexterous and precise surgical approach to work within the small confines of the eye, and the use of robotics offers numerous potential advantages to current surgical techniques. However, there is a lag in the development of a comprehensive training and credentialing system for robotic eye surgery, and certification of robotic skills proficiency relies heavily on industry leadership. We conducted a literature review on the curricular elements of established robotics training programs as well as privileging guidelines from various institutions to outline key components in training and credentialing robotic surgeons for ophthalmic surgeries. Based on our literature review and informal discussions between the authors and other robotic ophthalmic experts, we recommend that the overall training framework for robotic ophthalmic trainees proceeds in a stepwise, competency-based manner from didactic learning, to simulation exercises, to finally operative experiences. Nontechnical skills such as device troubleshooting and interprofessional teamwork should also be formally taught and evaluated. In addition, we have developed an assessment tool based on validated global rating scales for surgical skills that may be used to monitor the progress of trainees. Finally, we propose a graduating model for granting privileges to robotic surgeons. Further work will need to be undertaken to assess the feasibility, efficacy and integrity of the training curriculum and credentialing practices for robotic ophthalmic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:3192 / 3201
页数:9
相关论文
共 218 条
[31]  
Moit H(2016)Implementing a robotics curriculum at an academic general surgery training program: our initial experience J Robot Surg 10 209-30
[32]  
Dwyer A(2015)Validation and comparison of novel robotic cardiac surgery simulation-based training programs Can J Cardiol 31 S268-21
[33]  
De Sutter M(2016)Evaluation of robotic cardiac surgery simulation training: A randomized controlled trial J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151 1498-15
[34]  
Heinzel S(2016)Effect of training frequency on the learning curve on the da Vinci Skills Simulator Head Neck 38 1762-78
[35]  
Crawford D(2006)Robotic radical prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute training experience World J Urol 24 148-74
[36]  
Shay SG(2014)The role of the dual console in robotic surgical training Surgery 155 1-91
[37]  
Chrin JD(2012)Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills J Urol 187 247-5
[38]  
Wang MB(2015)External validation of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) Surg Endosc 29 3261-56
[39]  
Mendelsohn AH(2005)A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills Am J Surg 190 107-24
[40]  
Rusch P(1997)Testing technical skill via an innovative “bench station” examination Am J Surg 173 226-8