Competing influences that impact preservice teachers

被引:0
作者
Leah Daniel
机构
[1] James Cook University,College of Arts, Society & Education
来源
Mathematics Education Research Journal | 2021年 / 33卷
关键词
Preservice teacher; Decision-making influence; Mathematical content knowledge; Teacher education; Stimulated recall; Practicum;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Preservice mathematics teachers are subject to multiple influences when they make in-the-moment instructional decisions in classroom settings. Little is known about which influences make a significant contribution to decisions regarding the mathematical content knowledge (MCK) that preservice teachers decide to enact. The process by which mathematics preservice teachers manage multiple influences when making those decisions also requires particular examination. This study investigated six secondary mathematics preservice teachers’ content-related decisions and actions in ten lower secondary algebra lessons using a combination of lesson observations and stimulated recall interviews. The study uncovered five influences, each comprising a number of influencing elements, that led the preservice teachers to intentionally enact or alternatively to intentionally withhold certain aspects of their MCK during algebra lessons. Combinations of harmonious influences were regularly accommodated by preservice teachers, while other combinations of influences competed for the preservice teachers’ attention at different points in their lesson. The findings reveal that simply possessing content knowledge does not mean that preservice teachers are prepared to impart that knowledge to their students in the classroom context. The multi-faceted nature of content-related decision-making for preservice teachers suggests that content knowledge development should not be attended to in isolation within teacher education programs but should be located in teaching contexts wherever possible.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 408
页数:25
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Amador J(2013)Learning trajectories, lesson planning, affordances, and constraints in the design and enactment of mathematics teaching Mathematical Thinking and Learning 15 146-170
[2]  
Lamberg T(2008)Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education 59 389-407
[3]  
Ball DL(2010)Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress American Educational Research Journal 47 133-180
[4]  
Thames M(2012)Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: a review of the state of research Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 44 223-247
[5]  
Phelps G(1989)Cognition and improvisation: differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers American Educational Research Journal 26 473-498
[6]  
Baumert J(1999)The conceptual knowledge of preservice secondary mathematics teachers: how well do they know the subject matter they will teach? Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal 1 1-12
[7]  
Kunter M(1993)Preactive and interactive decision-making tendencies of less and more experienced preservice teachers Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 64 46-55
[8]  
Blum W(2018)Learning from lessons: studying the structure and construction of mathematics teacher knowledge in Australia, China and Germany Mathematics Education Research Journal 30 89-102
[9]  
Brunner M(2013)Teachers of mathematics as problem-solving applied mathematicians Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 13 121-136
[10]  
Voss T(2010)Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges Educational Research Review 5 1-24