Philosophical intervention and cross-disciplinary science: the story of the Toolbox Project

被引:0
|
作者
Michael O’Rourke
Stephen J. Crowley
机构
[1] Michigan State University,Department of Philosophy
[2] Boise State University,Department of Philosophy
来源
Synthese | 2013年 / 190卷
关键词
Toolbox Project; Philosophical intervention; Applied epistemology; Cross-disciplinary research; Collaboration; Communication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this article we argue that philosophy can facilitate improvement in cross-disciplinary science. In particular, we discuss in detail the Toolbox Project, an effort in applied epistemology that deploys philosophical analysis for the purpose of enhancing collaborative, cross-disciplinary scientific research through improvements in cross-disciplinary communication. We begin by sketching the scientific context within which the Toolbox Project operates, a context that features a growing interest in and commitment to cross-disciplinary research (CDR). We then develop an argument for the leading idea behind this effort, namely, that philosophical dialogue can improve cross-disciplinary science by effecting epistemic changes that lead to better group communication. On the heels of this argument, we describe our approach and its output; in particular, we emphasize the Toolbox instrument that generates philosophical dialogue and the Toolbox workshop in which that dialogue takes place. Together, these constitute a philosophical intervention into the life of CDR teams. We conclude by considering the philosophical implications of this intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1937 / 1954
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of Chinese and Australian university academics' valence for teaching and cross-disciplinary research
    Li, Edward Feng
    McCormick, John
    Barnett, Kerry
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 69 (04) : 583 - 605
  • [42] ?It?s Not Us Versus Them?: Building Cross-Disciplinary Relationships in the Perioperative Period
    Sasnal, Marzena
    Lorenz, Karl A.
    McCaa, Matthew
    Wu, Adela
    Morris, Arden M.
    Schenker, Yael
    Shreve, Scott T.
    Giannitrapani, Karleen F.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2023, 65 (04) : 263 - 272
  • [43] Common criteria for evaluating cross-disciplinary research in global health: a scoping review
    Yan Ding
    Jessica Hooper
    Imelda Bates
    BMC Global and Public Health, 2 (1):
  • [44] Emerging outcomes from a cross-disciplinary doctoral programme on water resource systems
    Carr, G.
    Blanch, A. R.
    Blaschke, A. P.
    Brouwer, R.
    Bucher, C.
    Farnleitner, A. H.
    Fuernkranz-Prskawetz, A.
    Loucks, D. P.
    Morgenroth, E.
    Parajka, J.
    Pfeifer, N.
    Rechberger, H.
    Wagner, W.
    Zessner, M.
    Bloeschl, G.
    WATER POLICY, 2017, 19 (03) : 463 - 478
  • [45] ACADEMIC GLOBALIZATION: CULTUREACTIVE TO ICE-THE CROSS-CULTURAL, CROSS-DISCIPLINARY and CROSS-EPISTEMOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION
    White, Marta Szabo
    WMSCI 2010: 14TH WORLD MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL III, 2010, : 161 - 166
  • [46] A comparison of Chinese and Australian university academics’ valence for teaching and cross-disciplinary research
    Edward Feng Li
    John McCormick
    Kerry Barnett
    Higher Education, 2015, 69 : 583 - 605
  • [47] Building Bridges: Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration Between Family Therapy and Islamic Studies
    Kennedy, Kelly S.
    Godlas, Alan
    Gale, Jerry
    Parker, M. L.
    JOURNAL OF MUSLIM MENTAL HEALTH, 2010, 5 (03) : 350 - 367
  • [48] Collaborative Moments. Expanding the Anthropological Field through Cross-Disciplinary Practice
    Hastrup, Kirsten
    ETHNOS, 2018, 83 (02) : 316 - 334
  • [49] Cross-disciplinary Participatory & Contextual Design Research: Creating a Teacher Dashboard Application
    Abel, Troy D.
    Evans, Michael A.
    INTERACTION DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURES, 2013, (19) : 63 - 76
  • [50] Cross-disciplinary research in cancer: an opportunity to narrow the knowledge-practice gap
    Urquhart, R.
    Grunfeld, E.
    Jackson, L.
    Sargeant, J.
    Porter, G. A.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (06) : E512 - E521