Philosophical intervention and cross-disciplinary science: the story of the Toolbox Project

被引:0
|
作者
Michael O’Rourke
Stephen J. Crowley
机构
[1] Michigan State University,Department of Philosophy
[2] Boise State University,Department of Philosophy
来源
Synthese | 2013年 / 190卷
关键词
Toolbox Project; Philosophical intervention; Applied epistemology; Cross-disciplinary research; Collaboration; Communication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this article we argue that philosophy can facilitate improvement in cross-disciplinary science. In particular, we discuss in detail the Toolbox Project, an effort in applied epistemology that deploys philosophical analysis for the purpose of enhancing collaborative, cross-disciplinary scientific research through improvements in cross-disciplinary communication. We begin by sketching the scientific context within which the Toolbox Project operates, a context that features a growing interest in and commitment to cross-disciplinary research (CDR). We then develop an argument for the leading idea behind this effort, namely, that philosophical dialogue can improve cross-disciplinary science by effecting epistemic changes that lead to better group communication. On the heels of this argument, we describe our approach and its output; in particular, we emphasize the Toolbox instrument that generates philosophical dialogue and the Toolbox workshop in which that dialogue takes place. Together, these constitute a philosophical intervention into the life of CDR teams. We conclude by considering the philosophical implications of this intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1937 / 1954
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The science of workplace meetings: Integrating findings, building new theoretical angles, and embracing cross-disciplinary research
    Allen, Joseph A.
    Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale
    ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2023, 13 (04) : 351 - 354
  • [22] A cross-disciplinary path to healthy and energy efficient buildings
    Lex, Simon Westergaard
    Cari, Davide
    Rasmussen, Morten Koed
    Bacher, Peder
    Bachalarz, Magnus
    Madsen, Henrik
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 142 : 273 - 284
  • [23] Reaching across the aisle: Cross-disciplinary collaboration in otolaryngology research
    Kim, Sun Joo
    Choi, Won Kyu
    Lee, Andrew H.
    Yi, Paul H.
    Boss, Emily
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2019, 129 (08) : 1800 - 1805
  • [24] A NEW PARADIGM IN CROSS-DISCIPLINARY UNDERGRADUATE ART AND DESIGN EDUCATION
    Wilgeroth, Paul
    DESIGN EDUCATION: COLLABORATION AND CROSS-DISCIPLINARY, 2016, : 264 - 269
  • [25] Adventures in cross-disciplinary studies: Grand strategy and fisheries management
    Bailey, Jennifer
    MARINE POLICY, 2016, 63 : 18 - 27
  • [26] Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net)
    Spring, Bonnie
    Klyachko, Ekaterina A.
    Rak, Phillip W.
    McFadden, H. Gene
    Hedeker, Donald
    Siddique, Juned
    Bardsley, Leland R.
    Pfammatter, Angela Fidler
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2019, 3 (2-3) : 82 - 89
  • [27] Titles in research articles and doctoral dissertations: cross-disciplinary and cross-generic perspectives
    Hao, Jialiang
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2024, 129 (04) : 2285 - 2307
  • [28] Challenges for engineering libraries: Supporting research and teaching in a cross-disciplinary environment
    Ackerson, LG
    SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIES, 2001, 21 (1-2) : 43 - 52
  • [29] Communities at the nexus of entrepreneurship and societal impact: A cross-disciplinary literature review
    Bacq, Sophie
    Hertel, Christina
    Lumpkin, G. T.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2022, 37 (05)
  • [30] CROSS-DISCIPLINARY PEDAGOGY: FROM CHINESE FAN DANCE TO DESIGNING A BANDSTAND
    Hilton, Clive
    DESIGN EDUCATION: COLLABORATION AND CROSS-DISCIPLINARY, 2016, : 539 - 544