In vitro biological outcome of laser application for modification or processing of titanium dental implants

被引:0
作者
Ahmed Hindy
Farzam Farahmand
Fahimeh sadat Tabatabaei
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry
[2] Sharif University of Technology,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[3] Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Department of Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine
来源
Lasers in Medical Science | 2017年 / 32卷
关键词
Biocompatibility; Biological response; Differentiation; Laser; Surface modification; Surface coating; Titanium dental implants;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are numerous functions for laser in modern implant dentistry including surface treatment, surface coating, and implant manufacturing. As laser application may potentially improve osseointegration of dental implants, we systematically reviewed the literature for in vitro biological responses to laser-modified or processed titanium dental implants. The literature was searched in PubMed, ISI Web, and Scopus, using keywords “titanium dental implants,” “laser,” “biocompatibility,” and their synonyms. After screening the 136 references obtained, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria. We found that Nd:YAG laser was the most commonly used lasers in the treatment or processing of titanium dental implants. Most of the experiments used cell attachment and cell proliferation to investigate bioresponses of the implants. The most commonly used cells in these assays were osteoblast-like cells. Only one study was conducted in stem cells. These in vitro studies reported higher biocompatibility in laser-modified titanium implants. It seems that laser radiation plays a vital role in cell response to dental implants; however, it is necessary to accomplish more studies using different laser types and parameters on various cells to offer a more conclusive result.
引用
收藏
页码:1197 / 1206
页数:9
相关论文
共 293 条
[1]  
Kasemo B(1983)Biocompatibility of titanium implants: surface science aspects J Prosthet Dent 49 832-837
[2]  
Saini M(2015)Implant biomaterials: a comprehensive review World J Clin Cases 3 52-57
[3]  
Singh Y(1969)Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 3 81-100
[4]  
Arora P(2009)Modified titanium surfaces promote accelerated osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro Bone 45 17-26
[5]  
Arora V(2010)Regulation of angiogenesis during osseo integration by titanium surface microstructure and energy Biomaterials 31 4909-4917
[6]  
Jain K(2012)10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14 839-851
[7]  
Branemark P(2010)Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography Trends Biotechnol 28 198-206
[8]  
Adell R(2010)Influence of implant surfaces on osseointegration Braz Dent J 21 471-481
[9]  
Breine U(2007)Laser applications in oral surgery and implant dentistry Lasers Med Sci 22 217-221
[10]  
Hansson B(1988)The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3 231-246