First-Line and Maintenance Therapy for Ovarian Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions

被引:0
作者
Antonio González-Martín
Luisa Sánchez-Lorenzo
Raquel Bratos
Raúl Márquez
Luis Chiva
机构
[1] MD Anderson Cancer Center,Medical Oncology Department
[2] Hospital Central de Asturias,Medical Oncology Service
[3] MD Anderson Cancer Center,Gynecologic Oncology Department
来源
Drugs | 2014年 / 74卷
关键词
Overall Survival; Ovarian Cancer; Paclitaxel; Bevacizumab; Sorafenib;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy has remained the standard of care in the frontline therapy of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma during the last decade. Maintenance chemotherapy or immunotherapy has not been proven to impact on overall survival and only one clinical trial that explored the administration of monthly paclitaxel for 1 year showed a benefit in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), but at the cost of maintained alopecia and increased peripheral neuropathy. This scenario may be changing with the incorporation of targeted therapy to the frontline therapy of ovarian cancer. In particular, anti-angiogenic therapy has been identified as the most promising targeted therapy, and the addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy followed by a maintenance period of bevacizumab in monotherapy has shown to prolong PFS. This was considered the proof of concept of the value of anti-angiogenic therapy in the frontline of ovarian cancer, and the results of two additional clinical trials with anti-angiogenic tyrosine-kinase inhibitors have shown results in the same direction.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 889
页数:10
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Siegel R(2012)Cancer statistics 2012 CA Cancer J Clin 62 10-29
[2]  
Naishadham D(2009)The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation Nat Rev Cancer 9 415-428
[3]  
Jemal A(2011)2010 Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus statement on clinical trials in ovarian cancer: report from the Fourth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference Int J Gynecol Cancer 21 750-755
[4]  
Bast RC(2009)Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO) Cancer 115 1234-1244
[5]  
Hennessy B(2009)Variations in institutional infrastructure, physician specialization and experience, and outcome in ovarian cancer: a systematic review Gynecol Oncol 112 422-436
[6]  
Mills GB(2005)2004 consensus statements on the management of ovarian cancer: final document of the 3rd International Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (GCIG OCCC 2004) Ann Oncol 16 viii7-viii12
[7]  
Stuart GC(1996)Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and IV ovarian cancer N Eng J Med 334 1-6
[8]  
Kitchener H(2000)Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel vs cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three year results J Natl Cancer Inst 92 699-708
[9]  
Bacon M(2000)Exploratory phase III study of paclitaxel and cisplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer J Clin Oncol 18 3084-3092
[10]  
du Bois A(2003)A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 95 1320-1330