Monte Carlo simulation of the dose to nuclear medicine staff wearing protective garments

被引:0
作者
L. S. Fog
P. Collins
机构
[1] Flinders Medical Centre,Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection
[2] Royal Adelaide Hospital,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Bone Densitometry
来源
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine | 2008年 / 31卷
关键词
nuclear medicine; protective garment; attenuation; Monte Carlo simulation; lead;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The literature contains both endorsements of, and advice against, the use of protective apparel in nuclear medicine procedures. The main issues usually centre around: Whether the shielding which can be provided by a protective garment light enough to wear (0 to 0.6 mm lead equivalent at the gamma energies commonly encountered in nuclear medicine) is enough to warrant its use; and (more recently); Whether the dose enhancement behind the protective garment from electron scatter in lead is sufficient to be of concern. In this work, the Monte Carlo code EGSnrc was used to investigate the effectiveness of lead of thicknesses of 0 to 0.6 mm, in shielding staff from photons of energies of 140 and 511 keV. Furthermore, dose escalation behind the lead was investigated. Reasonable dose reductions are obtained at 140 keV with protective garments of 0.5 mm lead equivalence. This perhaps warrants their use, in certain circumstances. At 511 keV, the reduction in dose is less than 10%, and their use is probably not justified (given the weight that has to be carried) from an ALARA point of view. It should be noted here that protective garments designed for X-ray shielding will generally not have the same lead equivalence at the gamma energies used in nuclear medicine. It should also be noted that protective garments which do not contain lead do not always attenuate as much as their stated lead equivalence claims. Dose escalation does occur, but the depth of penetration of the scattered electrons beyond the exit side of the lead shielding is such that it is highly unlikely that a significant dose would be delivered to viable tissue in wearers of protective garments.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 316
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Finnerty M.(2005)Protective aprons in imaging departments: manufacturer stated lead equivalence require validation Eur. Radiol 15 2005-2005
[2]  
Brennan P.C.(1999)Low Back Pain, Lead Aprons, and the Angiographer American Journal of Neuroradiology 21 1364-1364
[3]  
Pelz D.(1995)Effectiveness of Lead Aprons in Vascular Radiology: Results of Clinical Measurements Radiology 197 473-478
[4]  
Kicken P.(2005)Light-weight aprons: light on weight. protection or labelling accuracy? Australas. Phys. and Eng. Sci. in Med. 28 128-130
[5]  
Bos A.(1998)Physical and biological interface dose effects in tissue due to X-ray-induced release of secondary radiation from metallic gold surfaces Radiation Research 150 92-100
[6]  
Muir S.(2007)The calculation of dose enhancement close to platinum implants for skull radiography Health Physics 93 267-292
[7]  
McLeod R.(2005)The role of protective lead clothing in reducing radiation exposure rates to personnel during equine bone scintigraphy Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 46 529-532
[8]  
Dove R.(2005)Radiation Dose to PET Technologists and Strategies to Lower Occupational Exposure J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 33 44-47
[9]  
Regulla D.(2006)Efficient beam dose calculations using DOSXYZnrc and BEAMnrc Med. Phys. 33 3046-3056
[10]  
Hieber D. B(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined