The contribution of vocabulary knowledge and spelling to the reading comprehension of adolescents who are and are not English language learners

被引:0
作者
Deborah K. Reed
Yaacov Petscher
Barbara R. Foorman
机构
[1] University of Iowa,Iowa Reading Research Center
[2] Florida State University,Florida Center for Reading Research
来源
Reading and Writing | 2016年 / 29卷
关键词
Spelling; Vocabulary; Reading comprehension; Adolescents; English learners;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined the contributions of vocabulary and spelling to the reading comprehension of students in grades 6–10 who were and were not classified as English language learners. Results indicate that vocabulary accounted for greater between-grade differences and unique variance (ΔR2 = .11–.31) in comprehension as compared to spelling (ΔR2 = .01–.09). However, the contribution of spelling to comprehension was higher in the upper grade levels included in this cross-sectional analysis and functioned as a mediator of the impact of vocabulary knowledge at all levels. The direct effect of vocabulary was strong but lower in magnitude at each successive grade level from .58 in grade 6 to .41 in grade 10 while the indirect effect through spelling increased in magnitude at each successive grade level from .09 in grade 6 to .16 in grade 10. There were no significant differences between the language groups in the magnitude of the indirect impact, suggesting both groups of students relied more on both sources of lexical information in higher grades as compared to students in lower grades.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 657
页数:24
相关论文
共 165 条
[1]  
Andrews S(2009)Lexical expertise and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down processing of lexical ambiguity Reading and Writing 22 687-711
[2]  
Bond R(2012)Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38 152-163
[3]  
Andrews S(2006)General multi-level modeling with sampling weights Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 35 439-460
[4]  
Lo S(2005)The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 20 50-57
[5]  
Asparouhov T(1986)The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173-1182
[6]  
August D(1985)An error analysis of misspellings made by learners of English as a first and as a second language Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 14 569-593
[7]  
Carlo M(1995)Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 57 289-300
[8]  
Dressler C(2010)Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7 Journal of Educational Psychology 102 635-651
[9]  
Snow C(2010)Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6 Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 39 141-163
[10]  
Baron RM(2010)The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature Review of Educational Research 80 144-179