A responsible AI framework: pipeline contextualisation

被引:0
作者
Eduardo Vyhmeister
Gabriel Castane
P.-O. Östberg
Simon Thevenin
机构
[1] University Collage Cork,Insight Research Centre
[2] Biti Innovations AB,undefined
[3] Institut Mines-Telecom,undefined
来源
AI and Ethics | 2023年 / 3卷 / 1期
关键词
Responsible AI; Manufacturing; AI; Ethics; Framework;
D O I
10.1007/s43681-022-00154-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Incorporating ethics and values within the life cycle of an AI asset means securing its development, deployment, use, and decommission under these perspectives. These approaches depend on the market domain where AI is operational – considering the interaction and the impact on humans if any process does not perform as expected – and the legal compliance, both required to ensure adequate fulfilment of ethics and values. Specifically, in the manufacturing sector, standards were developed since the 1990’s to guarantee, among others, the correct use of mechanical machinery, systems robustness, low product variability, workers safety, system security, and adequate implementation of system constraints. However, it is challenging to blend the existing practices with the needs associated with deployments of AI in a trustworthy manner. This document provides an extended framework for AI Management within the Manufacturing sector. The framework is based on different perspectives related to responsible AI that handle trustworthy issues as risk. The approach is based on the idea that ethical considerations can and should be handled as hazards. If these requirements or constraints are not adequately fulfilled and managed, it is expected severe negative impact on different sustainable pillars. We are proposing a well-structured approach based on risk management that would allow implementing ethical concerns in any life cycle stages of AI components in the manufacturing sector. The framework follows a pipeline structure, with the possibility of being extended and connected with other industrial Risk Management Processes, facilitating its implementation in the manufacturing domain. Furthermore, given the dynamic condition of the regulatory state of AI, the framework allows extension and considerations that could be developed in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 197
页数:22
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Lauer D(2021)You cannot have AI ethics without ethics AI and Ethics 1 21-25
[2]  
Xu LD(2018)Industry 4.0 state of the art and future trends Int J Prod Res 56 2941-2962
[3]  
Xu EL(2021)The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review Int J Prod Res 59 1922-1954
[4]  
Li L(2011)Explanation and trust: what to tell the user in security and AI? Ethics Inform Technol 13 53-64
[5]  
Zheng T(2021)Trust and medical AI: the challenges we face and the expertise needed to overcome them J Am Med Inform Assoc 28 890-894
[6]  
Ardolino M(1999)Trust, confidence and voluntary organisations: between values and institutions Sociology 33 257-274
[7]  
Bacchetti A(2020)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines Minds and Machines 30 99-120
[8]  
Perona M(2021)Beyond the promise: implementing ethical AI AI and Ethics 1 73-80
[9]  
Pieters W(2016)Human-Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58 525-532
[10]  
Quinn TP(2018)Ethics in artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue Ethics and Information Technology 20 1-3