Progression to advanced neoplasia is infrequent in post colectomy familial adenomatous polyposis patients under endoscopic surveillance

被引:0
作者
Ferga C. Gleeson
Georgios I. Papachristou
Douglas L. Riegert-Johnson
Anne-Marie Boller
Christopher J. Gostout
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,Miles and Shirley Fiterman Centre for Digestive Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
来源
Familial Cancer | 2009年 / 8卷
关键词
Familial adenomatous polyposis; Colon cancer prevention; Endoscopic surveillance; Polyp burden; Advanced adenoma; Thermal ablation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Study Aims Advanced neoplasia may occur in the remaining colon and distal ileum of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients who have had a prophylactic colon resection. The role of post operative lower GI endoscopic surveillance and management of advanced neoplasia in FAP patients is not well defined. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of post operative neoplasia and to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lower GI endoscopic surveillance and ablative therapy following prophylactic colon resection. Patients and Methods A retrospective analysis of 42 FAP patients with prior primary colon cancer preventative surgery undergoing lower GI surveillance and ablative therapy from 1992 to 2006. Results All patients had adenomatous disease identified upon initial endoscopy with advanced neoplasia identified in 6/42 (14%). Patients had a median of 4 endoscopic procedures of which 2 (range 0–12) were therapeutic, over a 49 month follow-up period (range 0–168) Thermal ablation with argon plasma coagulation, polypectomy and surgical intervention were required in 55%, 7% and 14% of patients. Ablative therapy complications were due to Nd: YAG laser and snare polypectomy (5%). Progression to advanced neoplasia from baseline pathology occurred despite ablative therapy in 3/42 (7%) patients. We propose a lower GI tract endoscopic surveillance program for post surgical FAP patients. Conclusion Despite prophylactic colon surgery, FAP patients continue to be at risk of neoplasia. The development of advanced neoplasia is infrequent in patients embarking upon endoscopic surveillance. Ablative therapy is effective and safe for the vast majority of FAP patients.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Galiatsatos P(2006)Familial adenomatous polyposis Am J Gastroenterol 101 385-398
  • [2] Foulkes WD(2002)Review article: genetic testing and counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer Aliment Pharmacol Ther 16 1843-1857
  • [3] Trimbath JD(2002)Heritable colorectal cancer syndromes: recognition and preventive management Gastroenterol Clin North Am 31 1107-1131
  • [4] Giardiello FM(1997)Surveillance of familial adenomatous polyposis patients after ileorectal anastomosis or ileoanal pouch anastomosis Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 7 111-127
  • [5] Boardman LA(2000)Risk factors for rectal cancer morbidity and mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 43 1719-1181
  • [6] Tytgat GN(2003)Risk of rectal cancer in patients after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: a function of available surgical options Dis Colon Rectum 46 1175-364
  • [7] Bjork JA(2001)Familial adenomatous polyposis: prevalence of adenomas in the ileal pouch after restorative proctocolectomy Ann Surg 233 360-823
  • [8] Akerbrant HI(2005)Prevalence and morphology of pouch and ileal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis Dis Colon Rectum 48 816-34
  • [9] Iselius LE(2003)Adenomas at resection margins do not influence the long-term development of pouch polyps after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis Am J Surg 186 32-382
  • [10] Church J(2004)Long-term outcome of familial adenomatous polyposis patients after restorative coloproctectomy Ann Surg 239 378-330