In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria

被引:0
作者
Maria Consuelo Cousido
Inmaculada Tomás Carmona
Lucia García-Caballero
Jacobo Limeres
Maximiliano Álvarez
Pedro Diz
机构
[1] Santiago de Compostela University,School of Medicine and Dentistry
[2] Xeral-Cíes Hospital,Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Microbiology
来源
Clinical Oral Investigations | 2010年 / 14卷
关键词
Antibacterial activity; Chlorhexidine; Concentration; Epifluorescence microscopy; Saliva; Substantivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The in vivo antimicrobial activity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) on the salivary flora up to 7 h after its application, using epifluorescence microscopy with the SYTO 9/propidium iodide dual staining, was evaluated. Fifteen volunteers performed a single mouthrinse with sterile water (SM-water), a single mouthrinse with 0.12% CHX (0.12% SM-CHX) and a single and double mouthrinse with 0.2% CHX (0.2% SM-CHX and 0.2% DM-CHX). Samples of saliva were taken at 30 s, and 1, 3, 5, and 7 h after each application. In comparison with SM-water, 0.2% CHX (SM and DM) showed a significant antibacterial effect up to 7 h after the mouthrinse, whereas this effect only persisted up to 5 h after the 0.12% SM-CHX mouthrinse. On comparing the two concentrations of CHX, significantly higher percentages of bacterial vitality were observed in all the saliva samples after the use of 0.12% CHX than after 0.2% CHX. On comparison of the 0.2% SM-CHX and 0.2% DM-CHX, significantly higher percentages of live bacteria were observed in the saliva samples taken at 1, 3, 5, and 7 h after the single mouthrinse compared with the double mouthrinse. The 0.2% CHX mouthrinse had the greatest antimicrobial activity on the salivary flora up to 7 h after its application, with a progressive recovery in bacterial vitality. The differences observed with respect to the 0.12% CHX mouthrinse demonstrate the influence of the concentration on its immediate antimicrobial activity and substantivity.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 402
页数:5
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Moran J(1992)A comparison of delmopinol and chlorhexidine on plaque regrowth over a 4-day period and salivary bacterial counts J Clin Periodontol 19 749-753
[2]  
Addy M(1994)The magnitude and duration of the effects of some mouthrinse products on salivary bacterial counts J Clin Periodontol 21 397-401
[3]  
Wade WG(1996)The substantivity of a number of oral hygiene products determined by the duration of effects on salivary bacteria J Periodontol 67 572-576
[4]  
Jenkins S(1998)Effects of topical oral antiseptic rinses on bacterial counts of saliva in healthy human subjects Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118 625-629
[5]  
Addy M(1997)Evaluation of oral hygiene products: science is true; don't be misled by the facts Periodontol 2000 15 40-51
[6]  
Wade W(2003)Effect of various chlorhexidine regimens on salivary bacteria and J Clin Periodontol 30 919-925
[7]  
Newcombe RG(1981) plaque formation J Clin Periodontol 8 295-310
[8]  
Elworthy A(1989)Comparison of in vitro and in vivo antibacterial properties of antiseptic mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine, alexidine. CPC and hexetidine. Relevance to mode of action Am J Dent 2 215-219
[9]  
Greenman J(1990)Toothpastes containing 0.3% and 0.5% triclosan. II. Effects of single brushings on salivary bacterial counts J Clin Periodontol 17 85-89
[10]  
Doherty FM(1970)The effects of 0.5% chlorhexidine and 0.2% triclosan containing toothpastes on salivary bacterial counts J Clin Periodontol 5 84-89