The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery

被引：148
作者：
Iglesia C.B. [1 ,2 ]
Fenner D.E. [1 ]
Brubaker L. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL
[2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612
来源：
International Urogynecology Journal | 1997年 / 8卷 / 2期
关键词：
Gore-tex; Marlex; Mersilene; Sacrocolpopexy; Suburethral sling;
D O I：
10.1007/BF02764826
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The aim of this review was to compare properties of the most commonly used synthetic meshes and describe their use in gynecologic procedures. An Ovid search of the English literature from 1966 to the present was carried out, together with a hand search of Index Medicus from 1950 to 1965. Articles involving the use of mesh in surgical procedures or comparative studies of the different mechanical properties of mesh are included. Overviews from urogynecologic texts and surgical texts are also included. All studies in this review consisted of retrospective case series (21 suburethral sling articles, 15 sacrocolpopexy articles, and five pelvic sling articles). No randomized prospective trials were available. Outcome variables, including cure rates and mesh-related complications, are reviewed and compared. Conclusions show that long-term success of the suburethral sling with synthetic mesh ranges from 61% to 100%, and the success rate of the abdominal sacrocolpopexies using mesh ranges from 68% to 100%. Mesh-related complications rates are frequent, with up to a 35% removal rate and 10% sinus tract formation for suburethral slings and 9% erosion rate for sacrocolpopexy. The ideal synthetic mesh material for pelvic surgery, one that induces minimal foreign-body reaction with minimal risk of infection, rejection and erosion, has yet to be developed.
引用
收藏
页码：105 / 115
页数：10
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [11] Voyles C.R., Richardson J.D., Bland K.I., Et al., Emergency abdominal wall reconstruction with polypropylene mesh: Short-term benefits versus long-term complications, Ann Surg, 194, pp. 219-223, (1981)
  • [12] Atrium Polypropylene Mesh Monograph, pp. 1-11, (1996)
  • [13] DiBenedetto A., Fleischer A., Biological properties of surgical mesh, Biomaterials in Reconstructive Surgery, pp. 819-829, (1983)
  • [14] Elliott M.P., Juler G.L., Comparison of Marlex mesh and microporous Teflon sheets when used for hernia repair in the experimental animal, Am J Surg, 137, pp. 342-344, (1979)
  • [15] Usher F.C., The repair of incisional and inguinal hernias, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 131, pp. 525-530, (1970)
  • [16] Moir J.C., The gauze-hammock operation, J Obstet Gynecol Br Common, 75, 1, pp. 1-9, (1968)
  • [17] Morgan J.E., A sling operation, using Marlex polypropylene mesh, for treatment of recurrent stress incontinence, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 106, pp. 369-377, (1070)
  • [18] Morgan J.E., Farrow Q.A., Stewart F.E., The Marlex sling operation. for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: A 16 year review, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 151, pp. 224-226, (1985)
  • [19] Drutz H.P., Buckspan M., Flax S., Et al., Clinical and urodynamic reevaluation of combined abdominovaginal Marlex sling operations for recurrent stress urinary incontinence, Int Urogynecol J, 1, pp. 70-73, (1990)
  • [20] Hilton P., Stanton S.L., Clinical and urodynamic evaluation of the polypropylene (Marlex) sling for genuine stress incontinence, Neurourol Urodyn, 2, pp. 145-153, (1983)
12345678