The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery

被引:148
作者
Iglesia C.B. [1 ,2 ]
Fenner D.E. [1 ]
Brubaker L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL
[2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612
关键词
Gore-tex; Marlex; Mersilene; Sacrocolpopexy; Suburethral sling;
D O I
10.1007/BF02764826
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this review was to compare properties of the most commonly used synthetic meshes and describe their use in gynecologic procedures. An Ovid search of the English literature from 1966 to the present was carried out, together with a hand search of Index Medicus from 1950 to 1965. Articles involving the use of mesh in surgical procedures or comparative studies of the different mechanical properties of mesh are included. Overviews from urogynecologic texts and surgical texts are also included. All studies in this review consisted of retrospective case series (21 suburethral sling articles, 15 sacrocolpopexy articles, and five pelvic sling articles). No randomized prospective trials were available. Outcome variables, including cure rates and mesh-related complications, are reviewed and compared. Conclusions show that long-term success of the suburethral sling with synthetic mesh ranges from 61% to 100%, and the success rate of the abdominal sacrocolpopexies using mesh ranges from 68% to 100%. Mesh-related complications rates are frequent, with up to a 35% removal rate and 10% sinus tract formation for suburethral slings and 9% erosion rate for sacrocolpopexy. The ideal synthetic mesh material for pelvic surgery, one that induces minimal foreign-body reaction with minimal risk of infection, rejection and erosion, has yet to be developed.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 115
页数:10
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Walker A.P., Biomaterials in hernia repair, Hernia, 4th Edn., pp. 534-540, (1995)
  • [2] Smith R.S., The use of prosthetic materials in the repair of hernias, Surg Clin North Am, 51, pp. 1387-1399, (1971)
  • [3] Hannah S.I., Chin A., Laparoscopic retropubic urethropexy, J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscopists, 4, pp. 47-52, (1996)
  • [4] Prophylaxis of pelvic sidewall adhesions with Gore-tex surgical membrane: A multicenter clinical investigation, Fertil Steril, 7, pp. 921-923, (1992)
  • [5] Cali R.L., Pitsch R.M., Blatchford G.J., Et al., Rare pelvic floor hernias: Report of a case and review of the literature, Dis Colon Rectum, 35, pp. 604-612, (1992)
  • [6] Cumberland V.H., A preliminary report on the use of prefabricated nylon weave in the repair of ventral hernia, Med J Aust, 1, pp. 143-144, (1952)
  • [7] Scales J.T., Materials for hernia repair, Proc Roy Soc Med, 46, pp. 647-652, (1953)
  • [8] Brun J.L., Bordenave L., Lefebvre F., Et al., Physical and biological characteristics of the main biomaterials used in pelvic surgery, Bio-Med Mat Eng, 2, pp. 203-225, (1992)
  • [9] Pourdeyhimi B., Porosity of surgical mesh fabrics: New technology, J Biomed Mater Res, 23, pp. 145-152, (1989)
  • [10] Chu C.C., Welch L., Characterization of morphologic and mechanical properties of surgical mesh fabrics, J Biomed Mat Res, 19, pp. 903-916, (1985)