A Prospective Study on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Oral Cancers Using Methylene Blue Dye Alone

被引:20
作者
Ramamurthy R. [1 ]
Kottayasamy Seenivasagam R. [2 ]
Shanmugam S. [2 ]
Palanivelu K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre for Oncology, Government Royapettah Hospital and Kilpauk Medical College, RAMA SWATHI”, Chennai, 600028, Tamil Nadu
[2] Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre for Oncology, Government Royapettah Hospital and Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai
[3] Department of Surgical Oncology, Coimbatore Medical College, Coimbatore
关键词
Oral cancer; Sentinel lymph node biopsy;
D O I
10.1007/s13193-014-0337-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) biopsy using a combination of radioisotopes and blue dyes have a good accuracy rate in predicting subclinical neck nodal metastases in head and neck cancers. However, the limited availability of lymphoscintigraphy facilities in India requires exploration of alternative methods of SLN detection. We evaluated the feasibility of using methylene blue dye alone in detecting SLN in cN0 early oral cancers. 32 patients with cN0 early (T1, T2) oral squamous cell cancers underwent SLN biopsy using peri tumoural methylene blue dye injection. Blue dye stained (SLN) nodes were sent for frozen section analyses. Patients who had microscopic metastases in SLN underwent modified radical neck dissections and the rest underwent selective neck dissections. Paraffin sections and IHC studies were done on all nodes. SLN was identified in 29 patients (Identification rate = 90.6 %) of which SLN was positive for metastases on frozen section in 5 patients. The sensitivity, specificity and NPV of SLN with frozen section were 80 %, 95.8 % and 95.8 % respectively. IHC with cytokeratins increased the sensitivity (100 %) and NPV (100 %) at the loss of specificity (87.5 %). Methylene blue dye alone can be successfully used for SLN identification in early oral cancers with a good accuracy and sensitivity. This method will be of use especially in resource limited countries and centres where nuclear medicine facilities are not widely available. However, it has to be validated by larger randomised multi institutional trials for wider applicability. Immunohistochemistry increases the sensitivity and negative predictive value of SLN but its applicability in real time decision making is limited. © 2014, Indian Association of Surgical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 183
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
National Cancer Registry Programme, Indian Council of Medical Research, (2003)
[2]  
National Cancer Registry Programme, Indian Council of Medical Research, (2004)
[3]  
DeVita V.T., Lawrence T.S., DeVita R.S.A., Hellman and Rosenberg’s Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 9th (ed), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (USA) Chapter, 70, 1, (2011)
[4]  
Amaral T.M.P., da Silva Freire A.R., Carvalho A.L., Et al., Predictive factors of occult metastasis and prognosis of clinical stages I and II squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and floor of the mouth, Oral Oncol, 40, pp. 780-786, (2004)
[5]  
Kowalski L.P., Sanabria A., Elective neck dissection in oral carcinoma: a critical review of the evidence, Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 27, pp. 113-117, (2007)
[6]  
Yuen A.P., Ho C.M., Chow T.L., Et al., Prospective randomized study of selective neck dissection versus observation for N0 neck of early tongue carcinoma, Head Neck, 31, pp. 765-772, (2009)
[7]  
van den Brekel M.W., van der Waal I., Meijer C.J., Et al., The incidence of micro metastases in neck dissection specimens obtained from elective neck dissections, Laryngoscope, 106, pp. 987-991, (1996)
[8]  
Hoft S., Maune S., Muhle C., Et al., Sentinel lymph-node biopsy in head and neck cancer, Br J Cancer, 91, pp. 124-128, (2004)
[9]  
Chone C.T., Magalhes R.S., Etchehebere E., Et al., Predictive value of sentinel node biopsy in head and neck cancer, Acta Otolaryngol, 128, pp. 920-924, (2008)
[10]  
Alkureishi L.W.T., Ross G.L., Shoaib T., Et al., Sentinel node biopsy in head and neck squamous cell cancer: 5- year follow-Up of a european multicenter trial, Ann Surg Oncol, 17, pp. 2459-2464, (2010)