The Political Economy of Private Sector Development in Communist China: Evidence from Zhejiang Province

被引:0
作者
Qi Zhang
Mingxing Liu
机构
[1] Fudan University,China Center for Economic Studies, School of Economics
[2] Peking University,China Institute for Educational Finance Research
来源
Studies in Comparative International Development | 2013年 / 48卷
关键词
Factional politics; Political survival; Private sector; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article investigates a natural experiment in China’s Zhejiang province in order to identify why local officials across the province had varying motivations and capacities for protecting and promoting private entrepreneurship after 1949. As the result of communist revolution before 1949, all Zhejiang’s counties were divided into two categories in 1949: guerrilla counties and non-guerrilla counties. In guerrilla counties, local cadres were marginalized by the newly established provincial power structure and faced huge political insecurity, while their counterparts in non-guerrilla counties could rely on the patron–client network that was built by the provincial leadership for promotion. The local cadres in guerrilla counties were forced to cultivate popular support from below in order to guarantee their political survival, i.e., they looked after local economic interests by supporting local private sector development in exchange for the grassroots’ support. This mutual protection between local elites and potential private entrepreneurs explains why, relative to the non-guerrilla counties, the private sector was effectively protected after 1949 and therefore better developed in the long run. We argue that the analytical framework developed by this research can go beyond Zhejiang to apply to other provinces.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 216
页数:20
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Cai H(2006)Did government decentralization cause China’s economic miracle? World Poli 58 505-535
[2]  
Treisman D(1995)Chinese informal politics China Q 34 1-34
[3]  
Dittmer L(1996)Personal networks and postrevolutionary state building: Soviet Russia reexamined World Poli. 48 551-578
[4]  
Easter G(1990)The Wenzhou model for economic development: impressions China Info. 5 53-64
[5]  
Forster K(2007)Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats Comp Poli Stud. 40 1279-1301
[6]  
Gandhi J(2009)Investment without democracy: ruling-party institutionalization and credible commitment in autocracies J Comp Econ 32 123-139
[7]  
Przeworski A(1992)The “Wenzhou model” of development and China’s modernization Asian Survey. 32 696-711
[8]  
Gehlbach S(1992)Reform from below: the private economy and local politics in the rural industrialization of Wenzhou China Q 130 293-316
[9]  
Keefer P(2000)Booty socialism, bureau-preneurs, and the state in transition: organizational corruption in China Comp Poli. 32 273-294
[10]  
Liu A(2010)Political order and one-party rule Ann Rev Poli Sci. 13 123-143