Single-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection after knee and hip arthroplasties: indications and treatments

被引:0
作者
Wenbo Mu
Baochao Ji
Li Cao
机构
[1] the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Department of Orthopedics
[2] Xinjiang Medical University,Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy
来源
Arthroplasty | / 5卷
关键词
Single-stage; Chronic; Periprosthetic joint infection; Indication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Single-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection has been introduced 40 years ago. This option is gaining more and more attention as well as popularity. It is a reliable treatment for the chronic periprosthetic joint infection after knee and hip arthroplasties when implemented by an experienced multi-disciplinary team. However, its indications and corresponding treatments remain controversial. This review focused on the indications and specific treatments related to the option, with an attempt to help surgeons to use this method with more favorable outcomes.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Huotari K(2015)The incidence of late prosthetic joint infections: a registry-based study of 112,708 primary hip and knee replacements Acta Orthop 86 321-325
[2]  
Peltola M(2012)Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States J Arthroplasty 27 61-65
[3]  
Jämsen E(1978)Revision with gentamicin-impregnated cement for deep infections in total hip arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Am 60 1059-1064
[4]  
Kurtz SM(1981)Management of deep infection of total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 63-B 342-353
[5]  
Lau E(2020)The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: safety and efficacy of two stage versus one stage exchange arthroplasty Expert Rev Med Devices 17 245-252
[6]  
Watson H(2021)Comparison of patient reported outcome measures after single versus two-stage revision for chronic infection of total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141 1789-1796
[7]  
Carlsson AS(2021)A comparison of short term complication rate between 44 two- and 385 one-stage septic exchange arthroplasties in chronic periprosthetic joint infections Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 107 102668-304
[8]  
Josefsson G(2021)Single-stage revision of the infected total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved functional outcomes: a propensity score-matched cohort study J Arthroplasty 36 298-502
[9]  
Lindberg L(2019)Outcome of single-stage versus two-stage exchange for revision knee arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic infection EFORT Open Rev 4 495-521
[10]  
Buchholz HW(2021)Experiences during Switching from Two-Stage to One-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Chronic Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection Antibiotics (Basel) 10 1436-344