Nurse practitioner interactions in acute and long-term care: An exploration of the role of knotworking in supporting interprofessional collaboration

被引:8
作者
Hurlock-Chorostecki C. [1 ]
van Soeren M. [1 ]
MacMillan K. [2 ]
Sidani S. [3 ]
Donald F. [3 ]
Reeves S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Western University, School of Nursing, London, ON
[2] Dalhousie University, School of Nursing, Halifax, NS
[3] Ryerson University, School of Nursing, Toronto, ON
[4] University of London, Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, London
关键词
Nurse Practitioner; Family Meeting; Interprofessional Collaboration; Ethnographic Observation; Separate Thread;
D O I
10.1186/s12912-015-0102-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Interprofessional care ensures high quality healthcare. Effective interprofessional collaboration is required to enable interprofessional care, although within the acute care hospital setting interprofessional collaboration is considered suboptimal. The integration of nurse practitioner roles into the acute and long-term care settings is influencing enhanced care. What remains unknown is how the nurse practitioner role enacts interprofessional collaboration or enables interprofessional care to promote high quality care. The study aim was to understand how nurse practitioners employed in acute and long-term care settings enable interprofessional collaboration and care. Method: Nurse practitioner interactions with other healthcare professionals were observed throughout the work day. These interactions were explored within the context of "knotworking" to create an understanding of their social practices and processes supporting interprofessional collaboration. Healthcare professionals who worked with nurse practitioners were invited to share their perceptions of valued role attributes and impacts. Results: Twenty-four nurse practitioners employed at six hospitals participated. 384 hours of observation provided 1,284 observed interactions for analysis. Two types of observed interactions are comparable to knotworking. Rapid interactions resemble the traditional knotworking described in earlier studies, while brief interactions are a new form of knotworking with enhanced qualities that more consistently result in interprofessional care. Nurse practitioners were the most common initiators of brief interactions. Conclusions: Brief interactions reveal new qualities of knotworking with more consistent interprofessional care results. A general process used by nurse practitioners, where they practice a combination of both traditional (rapid) knotworking and brief knotworking to enable interprofessional care within acute and long-term care settings, is revealed. © 2015 Hurlock-Chorostecki et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Interprofessional education for collaboration: Learning how to improve health from interprofessional models across the continuum of education to practice, (2013)
  • [2] Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice, pp. 1-62, (2010)
  • [3] Reeves S., Lewin S., Espin S., Zwarenstein M., Interprofessional teamwork for health and social care, (2010)
  • [4] Hurlock-Chorostecki C., Soeren M., MacMillan K., Sidani S., Collins L., Harbman P., Donald F., Reeves S., A survey of interprofessional activity of acute and long-term care employed nurse practitioners, J Am Assoc Nurse Pract, 27, 9, pp. 507-513, (2015)
  • [5] Hurlock-Chorostecki C., Soeren M., Goodwin S., The acute care nurse practitioner in Ontario: A workforce study, Can J Nurs Leadersh, 21, 4, pp. 96-112, (2008)
  • [6] Kleinpell R., Ely W., Grabenkort R., Nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the intensive care unit: An evidence-based review, Crit Care Med, 36, 10, pp. 2888-2897, (2008)
  • [7] Keough V., Stevenson A., Martinovich Z., Young R., Tanabe P., Nurse practitioner certification and practice settings: Implications for education and practice, J Nurs Scholarsh, 43, 2, pp. 195-202, (2011)
  • [8] Soeren M., Hurlock-Chorostecki C., Goodwin S., Baker E., The primary healthcare nurse practitioner in Ontario: A workforce study, Can J Nurs Leadersh, 22, 2, pp. 58-72, (2009)
  • [9] Reeves S., Lewin S., Interprofessional collaboration in the hospital: Strategies and meanings, J Health Serv Res Pol, 9, 4, pp. 218-225, (2004)
  • [10] Varpio L., Hall P., Lingard L., Schryer C., Interprofessional communication and medical error: A reframing of research questions and approaches, Acad Med, 83, 10, pp. S76-81, (2008)