Athrombogenic coating of long-term venous catheter for cancer patients: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial

被引:0
作者
Felicitas Hitz
Dirk Klingbiel
Aurelius Omlin
Salomé Riniker
Andreas Zerz
Thomas Cerny
机构
[1] Kantonsspital St. Gallen,Department of Oncology–Haematology
[2] Chirurgische Klinik,Kantonsspital Bruderholz
[3] Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Coordinating Center,undefined
来源
Annals of Hematology | 2012年 / 91卷
关键词
Central venous catheter; Athrombogenic layer; Coated; Cancer; Venous thrombosis; Infection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cancer patients with long-term venous catheter are at risk for thromboembolic complications at the catheter tip and in the adjacent venous vessels. We assessed whether local thrombogenicity could be prevented with an experimental coated (with athrombogenic layer) catheter device (CD) compared to an uncoated CD. Patients requiring a long-term venous catheter were randomly allocated to receive either a standard uncoated or experimental coated (with athrombogenic Camouflage® layer) CD. The athrombogenic layer creates a barrier against non-specific adsorption of plasma proteins. The primary endpoint was urokinase injection in cases of an unsuccessful blood aspiration from the CD. Secondary endpoints included early (haematoma, pneumothorax) and late (venous thrombosis, infection) catheter-associated complications and catheter defects. One hundred and seventy-nine patients were randomly assigned to a CD (experimental n = 89/standard n = 90). One hundred and ten (62%) patients with a total of 1,286 catheter taps were analysed for the primary endpoint. Necessity for urokinase injection was 8/680 (1.2% experimental) vs. 33/606 (5.4% standard) per catheter tap and 4/55 (7.3% experimental) vs. 18/55 (32.7% standard) per patient. A repeated measures logistic regression to assess the effect of coating yielded an odds ratio of 3.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.2–10.4; p = 0.03) for the primary endpoint. All patients allocated per protocol were analysed for the secondary endpoints. Nine (5.4%) local thrombotic complications, seven (4.1%) catheter infections, and no catheter defect were observed. Athrombogenic coating of CD in cancer patients resulted in a significant reduced necessity for urokinase injections and subsequently less inconvenience for patients and fewer costly interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 620
页数:7
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Vescia S(2008)Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence Ann Oncol 19 9-15
  • [2] Baumgartner AK(2004)Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest 126 338S-400S
  • [3] Jacobs VR(2000)Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study Arch Intern Med 160 809-815
  • [4] Kiechle-Bahat M(2002)Venous thrombosis in patients with solid tumors: determination of frequency and characteristics Thromb Haemost 87 575-579
  • [5] Rody A(2002)Variation in relative risk of venous thromboembolism in different cancers Thromb Haemost 87 1076-1077
  • [6] Loibl S(1991)Venous and arterial thrombosis in patients who received adjuvant therapy for breast cancer J Clin Oncol 9 286-294
  • [7] Geerts WH(1988)The thrombogenic effect of anticancer drug therapy in women with stage II breast cancer N Engl J Med 318 404-407
  • [8] Pineo GF(2004)Complications and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports J Vasc Access 5 174-178
  • [9] Heit JA(1997)Central venous thrombosis: an early and frequent complication in cancer patients bearing long-term silastic catheter. A prospective study. Thromb Res 86 101-113
  • [10] Bergqvist D(1984)Thrombogenicity of central venous catheters: prospective study of polyethylene, silicone and polyurethane catheters with phlebography or post-mortem examination Eur J Anaesthesiol 1 361-365