Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study

被引:0
作者
Zeynep Gümrükçü
Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz
机构
[1] Karadeniz Technical University,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry
来源
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing | 2018年 / 56卷
关键词
Stress analysis; Atrophic maxilla; Tilted implant; Short implant; Implant number;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aims to evaluate the stress values, created in peri-implant region as a consequence of loading on fixed hybrid dentures that was planned with different implant numbers, lengths, or tilting angulations. Thirteen three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis models were generated with four, five, or seven implants (group A, B, and C). Except the distal implants, all implants were modeled at 4.1 mm (diameter) and 11.5 mm (length) in size. Distal implants were configured to be in five different lengths (6, 8, 11.5, 13, and 16 mm) and three different implant inclination degrees (0°, 30°, and 45°). A 150-N load was applied vertically on prosthesis. Released stresses were evaluated comparatively. The lowest von Mises stress values were found in group C, in the 11.5-mm implant model. Tilting the distal implants 30° caused higher stress values. In 45°-tilting implant models, lower stress values were recorded according to the 30°-tilting models. The ideal implant number is seven for an edentulous maxilla. Tilting the implants causes higher stress values. A 45° inclination of implant causes lower stress values according to the 30° models due to a shorter cantilever. The ideal implant length is 11.5 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 989
页数:10
相关论文
共 255 条
[31]  
Ghasemi S(2005)Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant—a three-dimensional finite element analysis J Oral Rehabil 32 279-665
[32]  
Koodaryan R(2009)CT-based manual segmentation and evaluation of paranasal sinuses Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266 507-200
[33]  
Babaloo A(2002)Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation Clin Oral Implants Res 13 657-22
[34]  
Abolfazli N(2009)Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients J Oral Implantol 35 196-494
[35]  
Hernandez-Alfaro F(2004)Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults J Oral Rehabil 31 18-530
[36]  
Sancho-Puchades M(2005)Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis Clin Oral Implants Res 16 486-2788
[37]  
Guijarro-Martinez R(2004)Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis J Prosthet Dent 92 523-49
[38]  
Chiapasco M(2005)Effects of cantilever design and material on stress distribution in fixed partial dentures—a finite element analysis J Oral Rehabil 32 273-270
[39]  
Casentini P(2005)Effects of dental implant length and bone quality on biomechanical responses in bone around implants: a 3-D non-linear finite element analysis Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun 17 44-111
[40]  
Zaniboni M(2006)Application of the finite element method in dental implant research Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 9 257-432