Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study

被引:0
作者
Zeynep Gümrükçü
Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz
机构
[1] Karadeniz Technical University,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry
来源
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing | 2018年 / 56卷
关键词
Stress analysis; Atrophic maxilla; Tilted implant; Short implant; Implant number;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aims to evaluate the stress values, created in peri-implant region as a consequence of loading on fixed hybrid dentures that was planned with different implant numbers, lengths, or tilting angulations. Thirteen three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis models were generated with four, five, or seven implants (group A, B, and C). Except the distal implants, all implants were modeled at 4.1 mm (diameter) and 11.5 mm (length) in size. Distal implants were configured to be in five different lengths (6, 8, 11.5, 13, and 16 mm) and three different implant inclination degrees (0°, 30°, and 45°). A 150-N load was applied vertically on prosthesis. Released stresses were evaluated comparatively. The lowest von Mises stress values were found in group C, in the 11.5-mm implant model. Tilting the distal implants 30° caused higher stress values. In 45°-tilting implant models, lower stress values were recorded according to the 30°-tilting models. The ideal implant number is seven for an edentulous maxilla. Tilting the implants causes higher stress values. A 45° inclination of implant causes lower stress values according to the 30° models due to a shorter cantilever. The ideal implant length is 11.5 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 989
页数:10
相关论文
共 255 条
[1]  
Chou HY(2010)Combined effects of implant insertion depth and alveolar bone quality on periimplant bone strain induced by a wide-diameter, short implant and a narrow-diameter, long implant J Prosthet Dent 104 293-300
[2]  
Muftu S(2012)Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla Med Eng Phys 34 153-160
[3]  
Bozkaya D(2004)Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques Implant Dent 13 28-32
[4]  
Chang SH(2004)Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review Clin Oral Implants Res 15 677-682
[5]  
Lin CL(2012)Analysis of the biomechanical feasibility of a wide implant in moderately atrophic maxillary sinus region with finite element method Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114 1-8
[6]  
Hsue SS(2015)Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: a 3D-FEA biomechanical evaluation Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17 332-342
[7]  
Lin YS(2015)The comparison of stress distribution with different implant numbers and inclination angles in all-on-four and conventional methods in maxilla: a finite element analysis J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 9 246-253
[8]  
Huang SR(2013)Total reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with intraoral bone grafts and biomaterials: a prospective clinical study with cone beam computed tomography validation Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28 241-251
[9]  
Woo I(2009)Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24 237-259
[10]  
Le BT(2007)Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis J Prosthet Dent 97 35-43