Methodology for commissioning a brachytherapy treatment planning system in the era of 3D planning

被引:0
作者
Claire Dempsey
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital,Department of Radiation Oncology
[2] University of Newcastle,School of Health Sciences
来源
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine | 2010年 / 33卷
关键词
Brachytherapy; Planning; Commissioning; Oncentra;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To describe the steps undertaken to commission a 3D high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS). Emphasis was placed on validating previously published recommendations, in addition to checking 3D parameters such as treatment optimization and dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Commissioning was performed of the brachytherapy module of the Nucletron Oncentra MasterPlan treatment planning system (version 3.2). Commissioning test results were compared to an independent external beam TPS (Varian Eclipse v 8.6) and the previously commissioned Nucletron Plato (v 14.3.7) brachytherapy treatment planning system, with point doses also independently verified using the brachytherapy module in RadCalc (v 6.0) independent point dose calculation software. Tests were divided into eight categories: (i) Image import accuracy, (ii) Reconstruction accuracy, (iii) Source configuration data check, (iv) Dose calculation accuracy, (v) Treatment optimization validation, (vi) DVH reproducibility, (vii) Treatment export check and (viii) Printout consistency. Point dose agreement between Oncentra, Plato and RadCalc was better than 5% with source data and dose calculation protocols following the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) guidelines. Testing of image accuracy (import and reconstruction), along with validation of automated treatment optimization and DVH analysis generated a more comprehensive set of testing procedures than previously listed in published recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 349
页数:8
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Fraass B(1998)American association of physicists in medicine radiation therapy committee task group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning Med Phys 25 1773-1829
[2]  
Doppke K(1993)Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26 261-273
[3]  
Hunt M(1994)Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 40 Med Phys 21 581-618
[4]  
Kutcher G(2009)Commissioning of brachytherapy module of Oncentra Masterplan treatment planning system J Contemp Brachyther 1 224-230
[5]  
Starkschall G(1997)Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: Report of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group No. 56 Med Phys 24 1557-1598
[6]  
Stern R(2001)Automated seed detection and three-dimensional reconstruction: I: Seed localization from fluoroscopic images or radiographs Med Phys 28 2265-2271
[7]  
Van Dyke J(2005)Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 901-911
[8]  
Van Dyke J(2010)From point A to the sculpted pear: MR image guidance significantly improves tumour dose and sparing of organs at risk in brachytherapy of cervical cancer Radiother Oncol 94 173-180
[9]  
Barnett RB(2010)Three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy: a survey of the American Brachytherapy Society Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76 104-109
[10]  
Cygler JE(1995)Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: Recommendations of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group no. 43 Med Phys 22 209-234