Early identification of macrophage activation syndrome secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus with machine learning

被引:1
作者
Lin, Wenxun [1 ]
Xie, Xi [2 ,3 ]
Luo, Zhijun [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoqi [4 ]
Cao, Heng [5 ]
Fang, Xun [6 ]
Song, You [1 ]
Yuan, Xujing [1 ]
Liu, Xiaojing [1 ]
Du, Rong [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Rheumatol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Rheumatol & Immunol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Clin Med Res Ctr Syst Autoimmune Dis Hunan Prov, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Zhongnan Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Coll Med, Dept Rheumatol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Cent Hosp Wuhan, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Rheumatol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Machine learning; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Macrophage activation syndrome; HEMOPHAGOCYTIC LYMPHOHISTIOCYTOSIS; CLINICAL-FEATURES; FERRITIN; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s13075-024-03330-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe and life-threatening complication. Early diagnosis of MAS is particularly challenging. In this study, machine learning models and diagnostic scoring card were developed to aid in clinical decision-making using clinical characteristics.Methods We retrospectively collected clinical data from 188 patients with either SLE or the MAS secondary to SLE. 13 significant clinical predictor variables were filtered out using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). These variables were subsequently utilized as inputs in five machine learning models. The performance of the models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), F1 score, and F2 score. To enhance clinical usability, we developed a diagnostic scoring card based on logistic regression (LR) analysis and Chi-Square binning, establishing probability thresholds and stratification for the card. Additionally, this study collected data from four other domestic hospitals for external validation.Results Among all the machine learning models, the LR model demonstrates the highest level of performance in internal validation, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.998, an F1 score of 0.96, and an F2 score of 0.952. The score card we constructed identifies the probability threshold at a score of 49, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.994 and an F2 score of 0.936. The score results were categorized into five groups based on diagnostic probability: extremely low (below 5%), low (5-25%), normal (25-75%), high (75-95%), and extremely high (above 95%). During external validation, the performance evaluation revealed that the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model outperformed other models with an AUC value of 0.947, and the scorecard model has an AUC of 0.915. Additionally, we have established an online assessment system for early identification of MAS secondary to SLE.Conclusion Machine learning models can significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of MAS secondary to SLE, and the diagnostic scorecard model can facilitate personalized probabilistic predictions of disease occurrence in clinical environments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Lupus or not? SLE Risk Probability Index (SLERPI): a simple, clinician-friendly machine learning-based model to assist the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus
    Adamichou, Christina
    Genitsaridi, Irini
    Nikolopoulos, Dionysis
    Nikoloudaki, Myrto
    Repa, Argyro
    Bortoluzzi, Alessandra
    Fanouriakis, Antonis
    Sidiropoulos, Prodromos
    Boumpas, Dimitrios T.
    Bertsias, George K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2021, 80 (06) : 758 - 766
  • [2] In-hospital mortality in febrile lupus patients based on 2016 EULAR/ACR/PRINTO classification criteria for macrophage activation syndrome
    Ahn, Sung Soo
    Yoo, Byung-Woo
    Jung, Seung Min
    Lee, Sang -Won
    Park, Yong-Beom
    Song, Jason Jungsik
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2017, 47 (02) : 216 - 221
  • [3] Aringer M, 2019, ARTHRITIS RHEUMATOL, V71, P1400, DOI [10.1002/art.40930, 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214819]
  • [4] Dynamic Changes, Cut-Off Points, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Laboratory Data to Differentiate Macrophage Activation Syndrome from Active Disease
    Assari, Raheleh
    Ziaee, Vahid
    Mirmohammadsadeghi, Arash
    Moradinejad, Mohammad-Hassan
    [J]. DISEASE MARKERS, 2015, 2015 : 1 - 8
  • [5] Assessment of the HScore for reactive haemophagocytic syndrome in patients with rheumatic diseases
    Batu, E. D.
    Erden, A.
    Seyhoglu, E.
    Kilic, L.
    Buyukasik, Y.
    Karadag, O.
    Bilginer, Y.
    Bilgen, S. A.
    Akdogan, A.
    Kiraz, S.
    Ertenli, A. I.
    Ozen, S.
    Kalyoncu, U.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 46 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [6] Prognostic value of lipid profile in adult hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
    Cheng, Wanying
    Wang, Lingling
    Gao, Xin
    Duan, Limin
    Shu, Yongqian
    Qiu, Hongxia
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [7] The Immunology of Macrophage Activation Syndrome
    Crayne, Courtney B.
    Albeituni, Sabrin
    Nichols, Kim E.
    Cron, Randy Q.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [8] Clinical features of haemophagocytic syndrome in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases: analysis of 30 cases
    Fukaya, S.
    Yasuda, S.
    Hashimoto, T.
    Oku, K.
    Kataoka, H.
    Horita, T.
    Atsumi, T.
    Koike, T.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 47 (11) : 1686 - 1691
  • [9] Macrophage Activation Syndrome as Onset of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature
    Granata, Guido
    Didona, Dario
    Stifano, Giuseppina
    Feola, Aldo
    Granata, Massimo
    [J]. CASE REPORTS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 2015
  • [10] eDoctor: machine learning and the future of medicine
    Handelman, G. S.
    Kok, H. K.
    Chandra, R. V.
    Razavi, A. H.
    Lee, M. J.
    Asadi, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 284 (06) : 603 - 619