Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Kessler Distress Scale (K10): an application of the rating scale model

被引:0
作者
Evandro Morais Peixoto
Daniela Sacramento Zanini
Josemberg Moura de Andrade
机构
[1] University of São Francisco USF,
[2] Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás PUC-Goiáis,undefined
[3] University of Brasília UNB,undefined
来源
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica | / 34卷
关键词
Psychological distress; Anxiety; Depression; Validity; Reliability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]  
Anderson TM(2013)The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) as a screening instrument in older individuals American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21 596-606
[2]  
Sunderland M(2001)Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 25 494-497
[3]  
Andrews G(2012)Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) 22 423-432
[4]  
Titov N(2016)Validation of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in the 2012 Aboriginal Peoples Survey Health Reports 27 3-10
[5]  
Dear BF(2006)Factor structure and interpretation of the K10 Psychological Assessment 18 62-70
[6]  
Sachdev PS(2010)The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale in Te Rau Hinengaro: The New Zealand Mental Health Survey The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 44 314-322
[7]  
Andrews G(2020)Factors related to preventive COVID-19 infection behaviors among people with mental illness Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 119 1772-1780
[8]  
Slade T(2020)Internet-related behaviors and psychological distress among schoolchildren during COVID-19 school suspension Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 159 1099-1102
[9]  
Borsa JC(2020)Assessing mental health for China’s police: Psychometric features of the Self-Rating Depression Scale and Symptom Checklist 90-Revised International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 2737-493
[10]  
Damásio BF(2017)The bifactor model fits better than the higher-order model in more than 90% of comparisons for mental abilities test batteries Journal of Intelligence 5 27-260