Legal Conceptions: Regulating Gametes and Gamete Donation

被引:0
作者
Kath O'Donnell
机构
[1] University of Hull,Law School
来源
Health Care Analysis | 2000年 / 8卷
关键词
gametes; gamete donation; assisted reproduction; property; personhood; autonomy; control; identity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The growing scope of gamete donation and themanipulation of gametes makes it essential to developa coherent theory of the nature of gametes and theclaims which may be made in relation to them. Thenature of gametes is ambiguous, they blur thedistinctions between persons and property, but thecurrent legal framework which governs gamete donationand manipulation fails to address their status. Thisleaves unanswered fundamentally important questionsabout control of processes involving gametes andrights to use or control the gametes themselves andthe information which they represent. These areclaims which are rooted in the concept ofproperty. A property based analysis highlights thethemes of autonomy, personhood and control which lieat the heart of the claims made in relation to gametesand an account based on the notion of property forpersonhood offers a more coherent justification forrecognising claims in gametes and mediating disputes. This perspective exposes the inadequacies andinconsistencies of the legal construction of gametesand the legal regulation of gamete donation. Thepresent legal framework has not sought to develop acoherent construction of gametes, but to constrain thepractices of the assisted reproductive technologies(including gamete donation) within a framework whichis presented as least damaging to the traditionalideologies of the creation of the family.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 154
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Atherton R.(1999)En ventre sa frigidaire: Posthumous Children in the Succession Context Legal Studies 19 139-164
  • [2] Black J.(1998)Regulation as Facilitation: Negotiating the Genetic Revolution Modern Law Review 61 637-177
  • [3] Blyth E.(1990)Assisted Reproduction: What's in it for the Children? Children and Society 4 174-480
  • [4] Chadwick R.(1998)Can Genetic Counselling Withstand the Charge of Eugenics? Science in Context 11 471-129
  • [5] Chadwick R.(1995)The Human Genome Project, Predictive Testing and Insurance Contracts: Ethical and Legal Responses Res publica 1 115-383
  • [6] Ngwena C.(1988)Artificial Insemination Using Donor Semen and the Issue of Secrecy Social Science and Medicine 27 377-120
  • [7] Daniels K.(1999)Beware! Preimplantation Diagnosis May Solve Some Old Problems, but it also Raises New Ones Journal of Medical Ethics 25 114-61
  • [8] Draper H.(1996)The New Birthright? International Journal of Children's Rights 4 273-101
  • [9] Chadwick R.(1993)Our’ Bodies: Property Rights in Human Tissue Canadian Journal of Law and Society 8 113-212
  • [10] Freeman M.(1988)Secrecy: What Can Artificial Reproduction Learn From Adoption? International Journal of Law and the Family 2 46-365