Effect of Environmental Regulation on High-quality Economic Development in China—An Empirical Analysis Based on Dynamic Spatial Durbin Model

被引:0
作者
Yun Liu
Meng Liu
Gege Wang
Lulu Zhao
Pan An
机构
[1] Jinan University,College of Economics
[2] Wuhan University of Technology,College of Economics
[3] Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Institute of Food and Strategic Reserves
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2021年 / 28卷
关键词
Environmental regulation; High-quality economic development; Dynamic spatial Durbin model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2017, the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China put forward the concept of high-quality economic development, indicating that the Chinese economy has shifted from rapid growth to high-quality development. High-quality economic development is the growth mode of an innovation-driven economy, an innovative, high-efficiency, energy-saving, environmentally friendly, and high-value-added growth mode. Environmental regulation is an important means to solve economic development and environmental pollution and plays an important role in high-quality economic development. In order to explore the impact of China’s environmental regulations on the high-quality economic development, this paper based on the panel data of 30 provinces (cities) in China from 2004 to 2015 uses the dynamic spatial Dubin model (DSDM) to analyze the direct and indirect effects of China’s environmental regulations on high-quality economic development and regional heterogeneity. It also incorporates R&D (Research and Development) investment, government investment in environmental governance, and fiscal decentralization into the model and analyzes the direct and indirect effects of the above three factors in the process of environmental regulation affecting high-quality economic development. We found that China’s high-quality economic development is spatially related between different provinces. And environmental regulations have obvious direct and indirect effects in the impact of high-quality economic development in the central and eastern regions, and this effect phenomenon is not significant in the western region. R&D investment, environmental protection investment, and fiscal decentralization have different adjustment effects on environmental regulation and high-quality economic development, and the same kind of adjustment variable also shows obvious heterogeneity among different regions. Finally, we put forward relevant policy recommendations based on the conclusions, with a view to improving China’s high-quality economic development.
引用
收藏
页码:54661 / 54678
页数:17
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]  
Barbera AJ(1990)The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: direct and indirect effects J Environ Econ Manag 18 50-65
[2]  
McConnell VD(2020)Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies Sci Total Environ 746 140810-41945
[3]  
Cai X(2020)Impact of environmental regulation on green growth in China's manufacturing industry–based on the Malmquist-Luenberger index and the system GMM model Environ Sci Pollut Res 27 41928-383
[4]  
Zhu B(2003)Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations J Environ Econ Manag 46 363-13
[5]  
Zhang H(2009)Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China J Dev Econ 90 1-28
[6]  
Li L(2020)Effects of environmental regulation on capacity utilization: Evidence from energy enterprises in China Ecol Indic 113 106217-1066
[7]  
Xie M(2012)Dynamic spatial panels: models, methods, and inferences J Geogr Syst 14 5-402
[8]  
Cao Y(2007)Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions Energy 32 1055-322
[9]  
Liu J(2020)Environmental regulation and firm innovation: evidence from national specially monitored firms program in China J Clean Prod 271 122599-340
[10]  
Yu Y(2003)Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation J Environ Econ Manag 46 384-44