Comparison of international mine reclamation bonding systems with recommendations for China

被引:22
作者
Cheng L. [1 ]
Skousen J.G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surveying and Land Use, School of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), D11 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing
[2] Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, 26506-6108, WV
来源
International Journal of Coal Science and Technology | 2017年 / 4卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Administrative authority; Bond release; Bond types; Calculation method; Mining legislation; Public participation; Size of bond;
D O I
10.1007/s40789-017-0164-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mine reclamation bonds are used in countries with mineral mining to ensure that reclamation of the mined area is completed. The United States, Canada, and Australia are countries with established mine reclamation bond programs, with the United States coal system having been in place since 1977. China implemented a bonding system in 1998 and by 2013 all 31 provinces had established a system. An effective bonding system must be conditioned on fair and enforceable nationwide reclamation standard, stimulate companies to conduct reclamation by forming economic incentives rather than penalties that become a liability, and allow for full public participation. Based on these principles, this paper compares seven important factors for a successful reclamation bonding system: laws and regulations, administrative authority, bond types, bond size, calculation method, bond release, and public participation. The results show variation in policies and procedures for bonding among countries. Using principles and policies primarily from the United States, China should establish a national reclamation bonding system with legislation that forms a national authority to oversee and enforce reclamation standards and bond requirements. In addition, China can expand bond financial types and strategies, set the size of reclamation bonds at the level of a third-party reclamation cost, and set unified standards for calculation. Phased bond release should be established with specific reclamation criteria for each phase of release. Finally, bonding regulations should clearly identify opportunities for full public participation in the process. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 79
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Abandonment and reclamation., (2015)
[2]  
Permitting and reclamation., (2015)
[3]  
Associates C.C.S.G., Financial option for the remediation of mine sites: a preliminary study. Report to Mining Watch Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, (2001)
[4]  
Cheng L., Study on the mode of mine reclamation bond of China. Ph.D. thesis, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), (2009)
[5]  
Cheng L., Study on the release of mine land reclamation performance bond in China, Proceedings, 2010 IEEE international conference on advanced management science, 2, pp. 658-661, (2010)
[6]  
Cheng L., Designs of the form and operation mode of mine reclamation bond, Coal Econ Res, 30, 5, pp. 15-18, (2010)
[7]  
Cheng L., Hu Z., Study on the land reclamation performance bonds systems in mineral areas in China, China Mining Magazine, 17, pp. 18-19, (2008)
[8]  
Conrad G.E., Mine reclamation bonding—from dilemma to crisis to reinvention: what’s a state regulator to do? Interstate Mining Compact Commission, February, 11, (2014)
[9]  
Corkery M., Regulators fear $1 billion coal cleanup bill. New York Times, June, 6, (2016)
[10]  
Cowan W., Mackasey W., Robertson J., The policy frame work in Canada for mine closure and management of long term liabilities: a guidance document., (2010)