The Case for Endoscopic Treatment of Non-dysplastic and Low-Grade Dysplastic Barrett’s Esophagus

被引:0
作者
David E. Fleischer
Robert Odze
Bergein F. Overholt
John Carroll
Kenneth J. Chang
Ananya Das
John Goldblum
Daniel Miller
Charles J. Lightdale
Jeffrey Peters
Richard Rothstein
Virender K. Sharma
Daniel Smith
Victor Velanovich
Herbert Wolfsen
George Triadafilopoulos
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic in Arizona,Department of Internal Medicine
[2] Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Pathology
[3] Gastrointestinal Associates,Department of Internal Medicine
[4] Georgetown University,Department of Pathology
[5] University of California Irvine,Department of Surgery
[6] Cleveland Clinic Foundation,Department of Internal Medicine
[7] Emory University Medical Center,Department of Surgery
[8] Columbia Presbyterian Hospital,Department of Internal Medicine
[9] University of Rochester,Department of Surgery
[10] Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center,Department of Surgery
[11] Az Center for Digestive Health,Department of Internal Medicine
[12] Mayo Clinic in Florida,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
[13] Henry Ford Hospital,undefined
[14] Mayo Clinic in Florida,undefined
[15] Stanford University School of Medicine,undefined
来源
Digestive Diseases and Sciences | 2010年 / 55卷
关键词
Barrett’s esophagus; Radiofrequency ablation; Esophageal cancer; Adenocarcinoma; Intestinal metaplasia; Low-grade dysplasia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Non-dysplastic mucosa (ND-) in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) shows clonal molecular aberrations, loss of cell cycle control, and other features of “neoplasia.” These changes occur prior to morphologic expression of neoplasia (dysplasia). Morphologic evaluation of dysplasia is fraught with error, and, as a result, often leads to false-negative and false-positive diagnoses. Early “crypt dysplasia” is difficult to detect, and is often missed in routine biopsy specimens. Some studies show substantial progression rates of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and crypt dysplasia, to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Dysplasia, even when fully developed, may, in certain circumstances, be difficult to differentiate from non-dysplastic (regenerating) BE. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective method for removing mucosa at risk of cancer. Given the difficulties of dysplasia assessment in mucosal biopsies, and the molecular characteristics of ND-BE, this technique should be considered for treatment of all BE patients, including those with ND or LGD. Post-ablation neo-squamous epithelium reveals no molecular abnormalities, and is biologically stable. Given that prospective randomized controlled trials of ablative therapy for ND-BE aiming at reducing EAC incidence and mortality are unlikely to be completed in the near future, endoscopic ablation is a valid management option. The success of RFA in achieving safe, uniform, reliable, and predictable elimination of BE allows surgeons to combine fundoplication with RFA. Currently, there is no type of treatment for dysplastic or non-dysplastic BE that achieves a complete response in 100% of patients, eliminates all risk of developing cancer, results in zero adverse events, is less expensive in terms of absolute costs than surveillance, is durable for 20+ years, or eliminates the need for surveillance. Regardless, RFA shows established safety, efficacy, durability, and cost-effective profiles that should be considered in the management of patients with non-dysplastic or low-grade dysplastic BE.
引用
收藏
页码:1918 / 1931
页数:13
相关论文
共 310 条
[1]  
Sharma P(2009)Clinical practice. Barrett’s esophagus N Engl J Med 361 2548-2556
[2]  
Haggitt RC(1994)Barrett’s esophagus: pathogenesis, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma Hum Pathol 25 982-993
[3]  
Fitzgerald RC(2001)Barrett’s esophagus, dysplasia and pharmacologic acid suppression Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15 269-276
[4]  
Lascar R(2008)Update on the diagnosis and treatment of Barrett’s esophagus and related neoplastic precursor lesions Arch Pathol Lab Med 132 1577-1585
[5]  
Triadafilopoulos G(2009)Definition of Barrett’s esophagus: time for a rethink—is intestinal metaplasia dead? Am J Gastroenterol 104 2588-2594
[6]  
Odze RD(2005)Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study Gastroenterology 129 1825-1831
[7]  
Riddell RH(2005)A population prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus—finally Gastroenterology 129 2101-2113
[8]  
Odze RD(1992)Barrett’s esophagus: age, prevalence and extent of columnar epithelium Gastroenterology 103 1241-1245
[9]  
Ronkainen J(2002)Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in asymptomatic individuals Gastroenterology 123 636-639
[10]  
Aro P(2005)Increasing incidence of Barrett’s esophagus in the general population Gut 54 1062-1066