Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations

被引:0
|
作者
Stephen P. Diggle
Ashleigh S. Griffin
Genevieve S. Campbell
Stuart A. West
机构
[1] Institute of Infection,
[2] Immunity & Inflammation,undefined
[3] Centre for Biomolecular Sciences,undefined
[4] University Park,undefined
[5] University of Nottingham,undefined
[6] Institute of Evolutionary Biology,undefined
[7] School of Biological Sciences,undefined
[8] University of Edinburgh,undefined
[9] King’s Buildings,undefined
[10] Edinburgh EH9 3JT,undefined
[11] UK ,undefined
来源
Nature | 2007年 / 450卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Communication between bacteria via the release and sensing of small diffusible signal molecules, or quorum sensing, is thought to be a way of coordinating cooperative behaviours at the population level. Evolutionary theory predicts that individuals who communicate and cooperate are vulnerable to cheaters, who either do not signal or fail to respond to signals. Experiments in colonies of the pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which signals between cells to regulate virulence factor expression, now confirm that both signal and signal-receptor mutants (or 'cheats') do have a fitness advantage. But a solution to the cheating problem does exist in the form of kin selection — 'honest' communication is favoured when it is between close relatives. The findings provide an explanation for the spread of cheats that has been observed in bacterial infections of humans.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 414
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Alternative approaches to treat bacterial infections: targeting quorum-sensing
    Piewngam, Pipat
    Chiou, Janice
    Chatterjee, Priyanka
    Otto, Michael
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2020, 18 (06) : 499 - 510
  • [22] Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron
    Xin Chen
    Stephan Schauder
    Noelle Potier
    Alain Van Dorsselaer
    István Pelczer
    Bonnie L. Bassler
    Frederick M. Hughson
    Nature, 2002, 415 : 545 - 549
  • [23] Extensive and specific responses of a eukaryote to bacterial quorum-sensing signals
    Mathesius, U
    Mulders, S
    Gao, MS
    Teplitski, M
    Caetano-Anollés, G
    Rolfe, BG
    Bauer, WD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (03) : 1444 - 1449
  • [24] Wave effects in stochastic time lagging reaction-diffusion model of quorum-sensing in bacterial populations
    Kuttler, Christina
    Maslovskaya, Anna G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE DAYS ON DIFFRACTION (DD), 2020, : 62 - 67
  • [25] Toward plasmonic monitoring of surface effects on bacterial quorum-sensing
    Hill, Eric H.
    Liz-Marzan, Luis M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN COLLOID & INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2017, 32 : 1 - 10
  • [26] Quorum-sensing control of antibiotic resistance stabilizes cooperation in Chromobacterium violaceum
    Kara C Evans
    Saida Benomar
    Lennel A Camuy-Vélez
    Ellen B Nasseri
    Xiaofei Wang
    Benjamin Neuenswander
    Josephine R Chandler
    The ISME Journal, 2018, 12 : 1263 - 1272
  • [27] LuxS and quorum-sensing in Campylobacter
    Plummer, Paul J.
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 2
  • [28] Quorum-sensing interference in vibrios
    Zhang, Shanshan
    Yang, Qian
    Eggermont, Mieke
    Defoirdt, Tom
    REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2023, 15 (04) : 1452 - 1466
  • [29] Interkingdom Detection of Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Molecules by Mammalian Taste Receptors
    Kouakou, Yobouet Ines
    Lee, Robert J.
    MICROORGANISMS, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [30] Novel Quorum-Sensing Peptides Mediating Interspecies Bacterial Cell Death
    Kumar, Sathish
    Kolodkin-Gal, Ilana
    Engelberg-Kulka, Hanna
    MBIO, 2013, 4 (03):