A phase I/II study of rituximab and etanercept in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma

被引:0
作者
J A Woyach
T S Lin
M S Lucas
N Heerema
M E Moran
C Cheney
D M Lucas
L Wei
M A Caligiuri
J C Byrd
机构
[1] The Ohio State University,Department of Internal Medicine
[2] The Ohio State University,Department of Pathology
[3] Center for Biostatistics,undefined
[4] The Ohio State University,undefined
来源
Leukemia | 2009年 / 23卷
关键词
rituximab; etanercept; chronic lymphocytic leukemia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rituximab has modest activity in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma but is associated with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) release that can cause CLL proliferation and inhibit apoptosis. We examined whether disruption of TNF-α by etanercept improves response to rituximab in CLL. Eligible patients had previously treated CLL with performance status 0–3. Patients received etanercept 25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly (weeks 1–5) and rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously thrice weekly (weeks 2–5) using a phase I/II design. Primary end points were response and toxicity. The 36 enrolled patients had a median of two prior treatments; 50% were fludarabine refractory and 22% had del(17p13.1). Of the 34 response-evaluable patients, 10 (29%) responded, including 9 partial responses and 1 complete remission. Response was not affected by prior rituximab or fludarabine-refractory status, but no patients with del(17p13.1) responded. Median progression-free survival for responders was 9.0 months (range 1–43). Ten patients have had treatment-free intervals exceeding 12 months, including four who have remained untreated for 32, 43, 46 and 56 months. Adverse events were mild, including mild infusion reactions, transient cytopenias and grade 3 infections in 14% of the patients. The combination of etanercept and thrice weekly rituximab produces durable remissions in non-del(17p13.1) CLL patients and is well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 918
页数:6
相关论文
共 227 条
  • [1] Videbaek A(1960)Some clinical aspects of leukaemia Acta Haematol 24 54-58
  • [2] Bigley RH(1962)A comparison of chronic leukemic lymphocytic leukemia, chronic subleukemic lymphocytic leukemia, and lymphocytic sarcoma Cancer Chemother Rep 16 231-234
  • [3] Koler RD(1992)Second cancers in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia J Natl Cancer Inst 84 1422-1427
  • [4] Pirofsky B(2008)Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-WG) 1996 guidelines Blood 111 5446-5456
  • [5] Osgood EE(2007)Prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia Best Pract Res 20 455-468
  • [6] Travis LB(2006)Use of prognostic factors in risk stratification at diagnosis and time of treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia Curr Opin Hematol 13 266-272
  • [7] Curtis RE(1995)Advances in the biology and treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia Blood 85 307-318
  • [8] Hankey BF(2000)Fludarabine compared with chlorambucil as primary therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia N Engl J Med 343 1750-1757
  • [9] Fraumeni JF(2001)Randomized comparison of fludarabine, CAP, and ChOP in 938 previously untreated stage B and C chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients Blood 98 2319-2325
  • [10] Hallek M(1996)Multicentre prospective randomised trial of fludarabine versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CAP) for treatment of advanced-stage chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. The French Cooperative Group on CLL Lancet 347 1432-1438