Treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting: A quantitative systematic review

被引：0
作者：
Kazemi-Kjellberg F. [1 ]
Henzi I. [1 ]
Tramèr M.R. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Division of Anaesthesiology, Dept. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol., Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva
来源：
BMC Anesthesiology | / 1卷 / 1期
关键词：
Ondansetron; Metoclopramide; Granisetron; Droperidol; Domperidone;
D O I：
10.1186/1471-2253-1-2
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: The relative efficacy of antiemetics for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is poorly understood. Methods: Systematic search (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, bibliographies, any language, to 8.2000) for randomised comparisons of antiemetics with any comparator for the treatment of established PONV. Dichotomous data on prevention of further nausea and vomiting, and on side effects were combined using a fixed effect model. Results: In seven trials (1,267 patients), 11 different antiemetics were tested without placebos; these data were not further analysed. Eighteen trials (3,809) had placebo controls. Dolasetron 12.5-100 mg, granisetron 0.1-3 mg, tropisetron 0.5-5 mg, and ondansetron 1-8 mg prevented further vomiting with little evidence of dose-responsiveness; with all regimens, absolute risk reductions compared with placebo were 20%-30%. The anti-nausea effect was less pronounced. Headache was dose-dependent. Results on propofol were contradictory. The NK1 antagonist GR205171, isopropyl alcohol vapor, metoclopramide, domperidone, and midazolam were tested in one trial each with a limited number of patients. Conclusions: Of 100 vomiting surgical patients receiving a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, 20 to 30 will stop vomiting who would not have done so had they received a placebo; less will profit from the anti-nausea effect. There is a lack of evidence for a clinically relevant dose-response; minimal effective doses may be used. There is a discrepancy between the plethora of trials on prevention of PONV and the paucity of trials on treatment of established symptoms. Valid data on the therapeutic efficacy of classic antiemetics, which have been used for decades, are needed. © 2001 Kazemi-Kjellberg et al;licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Clergue F., Auroy Y., Pequignot F., Jougla E., Lienhart A., Laxenaire M.C., French survey of anesthesia in 1996, Anesthesiology, 91, pp. 1509-1520, (1999)
[2]  
Tramer M.R., Part I. A rational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: Evidence from systematic reviews. Part I. Efficacy and harm of antiemetic interventions, and methodological issues, Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand., 45, pp. 4-13, (2001)
[3]  
Henzi I., Walder B., Tramer M.R., Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A quantitative systematic review, Anesth. Analg., 90, pp. 186-194, (2000)
[4]  
Tramer M.R., Reynolds D.J.M., Moore R.A., McQuay H.J., When placebo controlled trials are essential and equivalence trials are inadequate, BMJ, 317, pp. 780-785, (1998)
[5]  
Fortney J.T., Gan T.J., Graczyk S., Wetchler B., Melson T., Khalil S., A comparison of the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of ondansetron versus droperidol as antiemetics for elective outpatient surgical procedures. S3A-409 and S3A-410 Study Groups, Anesth. Analg., 86, pp. 731-738, (1998)
[6]  
Tramer M.R., Phillips C., Reynolds D.J.M., Moore R.A., McQuay H.J., Cost-effectiveness of ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting, Anaesthesia, 54, pp. 226-235, (1999)
[7]  
Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carroll D., Jenkinson C., Reynolds D.J.M., Gavaghan D.J., McQuay H.J., Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?, Control Clin. Trials, 17, pp. 1-12, (1996)
[8]  
Tramer M.R., Moore R.A., Reynolds D.J.M., McQuay H.J., A quantitative systematic review of ondansetron in treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting, BMJ, 314, pp. 1088-1092, (1997)
[9]  
Morris J.A., Gardner M.J., Calculating confidence intervals for relative risk, odds ratio, and standardised ratios and rates. Statistics with confidence - Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines, pp. 50-63, (1995)
[10]  
Gavaghan D.J., Moore R.A., McQuay H.J., An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analysis in pain using simulations of individual patient data, Pain, 85, pp. 415-424, (2000)
123456