FDG-PET/CT predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease

被引:0
作者
Solène Querellou
Frédéric Valette
Caroline Bodet-Milin
Aurore Oudoux
Thomas Carlier
Jean-Luc Harousseau
Jean-François Chatal
Olivier Couturier
机构
[1] Hospital of the University of Nantes,Department of Nuclear Medicine
[2] Hospital of the University of Nantes,Department of Haematology
来源
Annals of Hematology | 2006年 / 85卷
关键词
FDG; Positron emission tomography; Hodgkin’s disease; Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Early therapy response assessment with metabolic imaging is potentially useful to determine prognosis in aggressive lymphoma and, thus, can guide first-line therapy. Forty-eight patients with aggressive lymphoma [24 Hodgkin’s disease (HD); 24 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)] underwent fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) before chemotherapy (PET1) and at mid-treatment (PET2). Therapeutic response was evaluated using conventional methods at mid-treatment. PET2 results were related to event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan–Meier analyses. PET1 was positive in all patients. PET2 was negative in 38 patients (18 NHL-20 HD) and positive in 10 (6 NHL-4 HD). Of the PET-negative patients, 61 and 65% achieved complete remission, and only 50 and 25% of PET-positive patients, respectively, for NHL and HD, achieved complete remission. Significant associations were found between PET2 and EFS (p=0.0006) and OS (p=0.04) for NHL, and EFS (p<0.0001) for HD (but not for OS, because no HD patient died). FDG-PET at mid-treatment can predict the outcome of patients with aggressive lymphoma and should be a useful tool to modify an ineffective therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 767
页数:8
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Kogel KE(2003)Current therapies in Hodgkin’s disease Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30 S19-S27
[2]  
Sweetenham JW(2005)Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a north American perspective Oncology (Willist Park NY) 19 26-34
[3]  
Sehn LH(1991)Prospective multicenter trial for the response-adapted treatment of high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: updated results of the COP-BLAM/IMVP-16 protocol with randomized adjuvant radiotherapy Ann Oncol 2 177-180
[4]  
Connors JM(1986)Chemotherapy for diffuse large-cell lymphoma-rapidly responding patients have more durable remissions J Clin Oncol 4 160-164
[5]  
Engelhard M(1989)Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: Cotswolds meeting J Clin Oncol 7 1630-1636
[6]  
Meusers P(1999)Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group J Clin Oncol 17 1244-1253
[7]  
Brittinger G(1998)Whole-body 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy- Ann Oncol 9 1117-1122
[8]  
Armitage JO(2001)-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for accurate staging of Hodgkin’s disease Haematologica 86 266-273
[9]  
Weisenburger DD(1998)Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose compared to standard procedures for staging patients with Hodgkin’s disease Clin Positron Imaging 1 161-164
[10]  
Hutchins M(2000)Staging Hodgkin’s disease with 18-FDG PET. Comparison with CT and surgery Haematologica 85 613-618