Testicular cancer and electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the workplace: results of a population-based case–control study in Germany

被引:0
作者
Cornelia Baumgardt-Elms
Wolfgang Ahrens
Katja Bromen
Ute. Boikat
Andreas Stang
Ingeborg Jahn
Christa Stegmaier
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
机构
[1] Hamburg Cancer Registry,Department of Environment and Health
[2] Fachabteilung Versorgungsplanung,Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology
[3] Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine,undefined
[4] University Hospital of Essen,undefined
[5] Saarland Cancer Registry,undefined
来源
Cancer Causes & Control | 2002年 / 13卷
关键词
case–control-studies; electromagnetic fields; radar; testicular cancer; workplace;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: In a population-based case–control study, we examined the association of testicular cancer and electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the workplace. Methods: Incident cases (n = 269) were recruited between 1995 and 1997. A total of 797 controls matched on age and region were randomly selected from mandatory registries of residents. EMF exposure was assessed for five categories in standardized face-to-face interviews using closed questions. For each exposure category, odds ratios (OR) were calculated, stratified by age and region, and in a more complex model weighted by duration and distance using conditional logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were conducted for seminoma and non-seminoma and for blue- and white-collar workers. Additionally, potential radar exposure was individually assessed by experts based on all available information including free text. Results: There was no excess risk for cases who reported to have ever worked near the following: radar units (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.60–1.75); radiofrequency emitters (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.60–1.24); electrical machines (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.72–1.33); high-voltage lines or high-voltage electrical transmission installations (OR & equals; 0.7; 95% CI = 0.38–1.18); or visual display units or complex electrical environments (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.67–1.21). The results for the weighted exposure and subgroup analyses did not differ substantially. For radar exposure as assessed by the experts, the OR was 0.4 (95% CI = 0.13–1.16). Conclusions: EMF exposure in the workplace does not seem to be a relevant risk factor for testicular cancer in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 902
页数:7
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [11] Finkelstein MM(1986)Testicular cancer mortality in England and Wales 1971–80: variations by occupation J Epidemiol Commun Health 40 26-29
  • [12] Floderus B(1989)Case-control studies of cancer in New Zealand electrical workers Int J Epidemiol 18 55-59
  • [13] Stenlund C(1997)Is testicular cancer an occupational disease? A case-control study of Royal Naval personnel J R Nav Med Serv 83 130-146
  • [14] Persson T(1997)Occupational exposure to magnetic fields in relation to male breast cancer and testicular cancer: a Swedish case-control study Cancer Causes Control 8 184-191
  • [15] Hardell L(1991)Cancer of the testis, socioeconomic status, and occupation Br J Ind Med 48 670-674
  • [16] Nasman A(1986)Cancer in the electric power industry BMJ 43 212-213
  • [17] Ohlson CG(1992)Incidence of cancer in Norwegian workers potentially exposed to electromagnetic fields Am J Epidemiol 136 81-88
  • [18] Fredrikson M(1991)Occupation and the occurrence of testicular cancer Am J Ind Med 19 327-337
  • [19] Hayes RB(1993)Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 54 165-177
  • [20] Brown LM(1993)Incidence of cancer in persons with occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in Denmark Br J Ind Med 50 758-764