Testicular cancer and electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the workplace: results of a population-based case–control study in Germany

被引:0
作者
Cornelia Baumgardt-Elms
Wolfgang Ahrens
Katja Bromen
Ute. Boikat
Andreas Stang
Ingeborg Jahn
Christa Stegmaier
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
机构
[1] Hamburg Cancer Registry,Department of Environment and Health
[2] Fachabteilung Versorgungsplanung,Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology
[3] Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine,undefined
[4] University Hospital of Essen,undefined
[5] Saarland Cancer Registry,undefined
来源
Cancer Causes & Control | 2002年 / 13卷
关键词
case–control-studies; electromagnetic fields; radar; testicular cancer; workplace;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: In a population-based case–control study, we examined the association of testicular cancer and electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the workplace. Methods: Incident cases (n = 269) were recruited between 1995 and 1997. A total of 797 controls matched on age and region were randomly selected from mandatory registries of residents. EMF exposure was assessed for five categories in standardized face-to-face interviews using closed questions. For each exposure category, odds ratios (OR) were calculated, stratified by age and region, and in a more complex model weighted by duration and distance using conditional logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were conducted for seminoma and non-seminoma and for blue- and white-collar workers. Additionally, potential radar exposure was individually assessed by experts based on all available information including free text. Results: There was no excess risk for cases who reported to have ever worked near the following: radar units (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.60–1.75); radiofrequency emitters (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.60–1.24); electrical machines (OR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.72–1.33); high-voltage lines or high-voltage electrical transmission installations (OR & equals; 0.7; 95% CI = 0.38–1.18); or visual display units or complex electrical environments (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.67–1.21). The results for the weighted exposure and subgroup analyses did not differ substantially. For radar exposure as assessed by the experts, the OR was 0.4 (95% CI = 0.13–1.16). Conclusions: EMF exposure in the workplace does not seem to be a relevant risk factor for testicular cancer in our study.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 902
页数:7
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Bergstrom R(1996)Increase in testicular cancer incidence in six European countries: a birth cohort phenomenon J Natl Cancer Inst 88 727-733
  • [2] Adami HO(1993)Clues to the aetiology of testicular germ cell tumours from descriptive epidemiology Eur Urol 23 8-15
  • [3] Möhner M(2000)Undescended testis and the risk of testicular cancer: importance of source and classification of exposure information Int J Epidemiol 30 1050-1056
  • [4] Møller H(1995)Epidemiology of testicular cancer Epidemiol Rev 17 433-449
  • [5] Stang A(1993)Cluster of testicular cancer in police officers exposed to hand-held radar Am J Ind Med 24 231-233
  • [6] Ahrens W(1998)Cancer incidence among Ontario police officers Am J Ind Med 34 157-162
  • [7] Bromen K(1999)Occupational magnetic field exposure and site-specific cancer incidence: a Swedish cohort study Cancer Causes Control 10 323-332
  • [8] Buetow SA(1998)Case-control study on risk factors for testicular cancer Int J Oncol 13 1299-1303
  • [9] Davis RL(1990)Occupation and risk for testicular cancer: a case-control study Int J Epidemiol 19 825-831
  • [10] Mostofi FK(1998)Testicular cancer and Persian Gulf War service Epidemiology 9 648-653