Responsiveness of the 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

被引：0
作者：
Luciana Gazzi Macedo
Chris G. Maher
Jane Latimer
Mark J. Hancock
Luciana A. C. Machado
James H. McAuley
机构：
[1] The University of Sydney,The George Institute for Global Health
[2] The University of Sydney,The Faculty of Health Sciences
[3] Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais,Escola de Educação Física, Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional
[4] The University of New South Wales,Neuroscience Research Australia
来源：
European Spine Journal | 2011年 / 20卷
关键词：
Low back pain; Questionnaires; ROC curve; Validity;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Several versions of the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) have been proposed; however, their responsiveness has not been extensively explored. The objective of this study was to compare the responsiveness of four versions of the RMDQ. Perceived disability was measured using the 24-item, two 18-item and an 11-item RMDQ on 1,069 low back pain patients from six randomised controlled trials. Responsiveness was calculated using effect size, Guyatt’s responsiveness index (GRI) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Effect size analyses showed that both 18-item versions of the RMDQ were superior to the 24- and 11-item versions of the RMDQ. GRI showed that the 24- and 18-item versions of the RMDQ were similar but more responsive than the 11-item. ROC curves revealed that the 11-item was less responsive than the other three versions, which had similar responsiveness. The results of this study demonstrate that the 24-item and both 18-item versions of the RMDQ have similar responsiveness with all having superior responsiveness to the 11-item.
引用
收藏
页码：458 / 463
页数：5
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Roland M(1983)A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain Spine 8 141-144
  • [2] Morris R(1987)Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments J Chronic Dis 40 171-178
  • [3] Roland M(2006)Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7 1-16
  • [4] Morris R(2006)A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire for low back pain J Clin Epidemiol 59 45-52
  • [5] Guyatt G(2004)Assessment of self-reported physical activity in patients wiht chronic pain: development of an abbreviated Roland–Morris disability scale J Pain 5 257-263
  • [6] Walter S(1997)Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland–Morris disability scale Spine 22 2416-2421
  • [7] Norman G(2001)Support for a shortened Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire for patietns with acute low back pain Physiother Can 53 60-66
  • [8] Lauridsen HH(2004)Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris disability questionnaire: intra class correlation and limits of agreement Disabil Rehabil 26 162-165
  • [9] Hartvigsen J(2004)24-item Roland Morris disability questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery J Clin Epidemiol 57 268-276
  • [10] Manniche C(2002)Roland-Morris scale reliability Phys Ther 82 512-515
12345678910