Building Climate Coalitions on Preferential Free Trade Agreements

被引:0
作者
Thomas Kuhn
Radomir Pestow
Anja Zenker
机构
[1] Chemnitz University of Technology,Department of Economics and Business Administration
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2019年 / 74卷
关键词
Climate change; International environmental agreements; Free trade; Issue linkage; Tradable permits; Strategic trade policy; Q54; Q56; F18; F15; Q58;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper we discuss the endogenous formation of climate coalitions in an issue-linkage regime. In particular, we propose a preferential free trade agreement on which a climate coalition should be built. The basic idea is that the gains of free trade can provide strong incentives for countries to join the coalition. As a framework, a multi-stage strategic trade model is employed in which each country may set an emission cap being effective on a permit market. In addition, a discriminatory import tariff may be imposed on dirty goods. However, at the heart of our approach is a preferential free trade arrangement among the members of a climate coalition leading to a favourable shift in the terms of trade. As a main result, trade liberalisation is found as an institution highly effective in building climate coalitions. In particular, the parametrical simulation of the model shows that participation in joint emission reduction is higher, consumption patterns are more environmentally friendly, and coalitional welfare is much more improved than in case of a single-issue environmental agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 569
页数:30
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Abrego L(2001)Trade and environment: bargaining outcomes from linked negotiations Rev Int Econ 9 414-428
[2]  
Perroni C(2002)Technical regulations and specialization in international trade J Int Econ 76 166-176
[3]  
Whalley J(1994)Self-enforcing international environmental agreements Oxf Econ Pap 46 878-894
[4]  
Wigle RM(1997)The strategy of trade sanctions in international environmental agreements Resourc Energy Econ 19 345-361
[5]  
Azim E(2001)International cooperation for sale Eur Econ Rev 45 1835-1850
[6]  
Barrett S(2016)The strategic value of carbon tariffs Am Econ J Econ Policy 8 28-51
[7]  
Barrett S(2018)Embodied carbon tariffs Scand J Econ 120 183-210
[8]  
Barrett S(2003)Equity, development, and climate change control J Eur Econ Assoc 1 601-611
[9]  
Böhringer C(2011)Efficiency vs. stability in climate coalitions: a conceptual and computational appraisal Energy J 32 49-75
[10]  
Carbone JC(1993)Strategies for the international protection of the environment J Public Econ 52 309-328