Mortality and risk factors associated with pulmonary embolism in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Carlos Andrés Gómez
Cheuk-Kwan Sun
I-Ting Tsai
Yang-Pei Chang
Ming-Chung Lin
I-Yin Hung
Ying-Jen Chang
Li-Kai Wang
Yao-Tsung Lin
Kuo-Chuan Hung
机构
[1] I-Shou University,School of Medicine for International Students, College of Medicine
[2] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras en el Valle de Sula,Department of Emergency Medicine
[3] E-Da Hospital,Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta
[4] Kaohsiung Medical University,Tung Hospital
[5] Kaohsiung Medical University,Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital
[6] Chi Mei Medical Center,Department of Anesthesiology
来源
Scientific Reports | / 11卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To determine, in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, the associations of pulmonary embolism (PE) with mortality and risk factors for PE as well as the therapeutic benefit of anticoagulant prophylaxis. Embase, PubMed, Cochrane controlled trials register, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to October 10, 2020. We included all published trials on PE in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with eligibility of the trials assessed following the PRISMA guidelines. Sixteen clinical trials with 5826 patients were eligible. There were significant associations of PE with the male gender [odd ratio (OR) = 1.59, 95% CI 1.28–1.97], mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.71, 95% CI 2.57–5.36), intensive care unit admission (OR = 2.99, 95% CI 2.11–4.23), circulating D-dimer [mean difference (MD) = 5.04 µg/mL, 95% CI 3.67–6.42) and CRP (MD = 1.97 mg/dL, 95% CI 0.58– 3.35) concentrations without significant correlation between PE and mortality (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 0.82–2.08) as well as other parameters or comorbidities. After omitting one trial with strict patient selection criteria for anticoagulant prophylaxis, significant prophylactic benefit was noted (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.1–0.91). Our findings identified the risk factors associated with PE in COVID-19 patients and supported the therapeutic benefit of anticoagulant prophylaxis against PE in this patient population.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]  
Raskob GE(2014)Thrombosis: A major contributor to global disease burden Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 34 2363-2371
[2]  
Angchaisuksiri P(2020)Thrombosis risk associated with COVID-19 infection. A scoping review Thromb. Res. 192 152-160
[3]  
Blanco AN(2020)Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 7 151-1661
[4]  
Al-Ani F(2014)The postthrombotic syndrome: Evidence-based prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Circulation 130 1636-277
[5]  
Chehade S(2020)Autopsy findings and venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 Ann. Intern. Med. 173 268-8
[6]  
Lazo-Langner A(2020)Prevention of thrombotic risk in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and hemostasis monitoring Crit. Care 24 1-1099
[7]  
Zhang C(2020)Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy J. Thromb. Haemost. 18 1094-169
[8]  
Shen L(2020)Venous thromboembolism in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection Thromb. Res. 193 166-296
[9]  
Le KJ(2020)SARS-CoV-2 and coagulation disorders in different organs Life Sci. 260 1184-1373
[10]  
Kahn SR(2020)Autopsy findings in COVID-19-related deaths: A literature review Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 279 1-902