Comparing the statistical distributions of energy efficiency in manufacturing: meta-analysis of 24 Case studies to develop industry-specific energy performance indicators (EPI)

被引:0
作者
Gale A. Boyd
机构
[1] Duke University,Social Science Research Institute and Department of Economics
[2] Duke University,Social Science Research Institute
来源
Energy Efficiency | 2017年 / 10卷
关键词
Efficiency; Energy performance indicator; Manufacturing; Normalized statistical distributions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is growing interest among policy makers and others regarding the role that industrial energy efficiency can play in mitigation of climate change. For over 10 years, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has supported the development of sector-specific industrial energy efficiency case studies using statistical analysis of plant level on energy use, controlling for a variety of plant production activities and characteristics. These case studies are the basis for the ENERGY STAR® Energy Performance Indicators (EPIs). These case studies fill an important gap by estimating the distribution of efficiency using detailed, sector-specific, plant-level data. These estimated distributions allow Energy Star to create “energy-efficient plant benchmarks” in a variety of industries using the upper quartile of the estimated efficiency distribution. Case studies have been conducted for 14 broad industries, 2 dozen sectors, and many more detailed product types. This paper is a meta-analysis of the approach that has been used in this research and the general findings regarding the estimated distribution of performance within and across industries. We find that there are few sectors that are well represented by a simple “energy per widget” benchmark that less energy-intensive sectors tend to exhibit a wider range of within-industry efficiency than energy-intensive sectors, but changes over time in the level and range of energy efficiency do not reveal any single pattern.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 238
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Azadeh A(2007)An integrated DEA PCA numerical taxonomy approach for energy efficiency assessment and consumption optimization in energy intensive manufacturing sectors Energy Policy 35 3792-3806
  • [2] Amalnick MS(2002)Technology gap, efficiency, and a stochastic metafrontier function International Journal of Business and Economics 1 87-93
  • [3] Ghaderi SF(2010)Modern management: good for the environment or just hot air?* The Economic Journal 120 551-572
  • [4] Asadzadeh SM(2005)A method for measuring the efficiency gap between average and best practice energy use: the ENERGY STAR industrial energy performance indicator Journal of Industrial Ecology 9 51-65
  • [5] Battese GE(2008)Estimating plant level manufacturing energy efficiency with stochastic frontier regression The Energy Journal 29 23-44
  • [6] Rao DSP(2014)Estimating the changes in the distribution of energy efficiency in the U.S. automobile assembly industry Energy Economics 42 81-87
  • [7] Bloom N(2014)Evidence of an “Energy-Management Gap” in U.S. manufacturing: spillovers from firm management practices to energy efficiency Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 68 463-479
  • [8] Genakos C(1993)The impact of energy prices on technology choice in the United States steel industry Energy Journal 14 47-56
  • [9] Martin R(2008)The evolution of the ENERGY STAR® energy performance indicator for benchmarking industrial plant manufacturing energy use Journal of Cleaner Production 16 709-715
  • [10] Sadun R(2007)The making of the EU emissions trading scheme: status, prospects and implications for business European Management Journal 25 453-463