Reduction of species coexistence through mixing in a spatial competition model

被引:0
作者
Senay Yitbarek
John H. Vandermeer
机构
[1] University of California,Department of Integrative Biology
[2] University of Michigan,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
来源
Theoretical Ecology | 2017年 / 10卷
关键词
Spatial self-organization; Cellular automata; Coexistence; Biodiversity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many ecological systems exhibit self-organized spatial patterns due to local interactions. Such patterns can promote species diversity and therefore serve as an important mechanism for biodiversity maintenance. Previous work has shown that when species interactions occurred at local spatial scales, species diversity was greatest when robust mosaic spatial patterns formed. Also, intransitive interactions led to the emergence of spiral patterns, frequently resulting in multispecies coexistence. In some instances, intransitive interactions reduced species diversity as the consequence of competitive hierarchies. Here, we extend and broaden this line of investigation and examine the role of global competition along a continuum ranging from spatial mosaics to spiral patterns. While previous models have predicted that species diversity is reduced when interactions occur over larger spatial scales, our model considers the effects of various levels of mixing on species diversity, in the context of various network structures as measured by the covariance of row and column sums of the competition matrix. First, we compare local competition (unmixed system) versus global competition (mixed systems) and show that greater species diversity is maintained under a positive covariance. Second, we show that under various levels of mixing, species diversity declines more rapidly under a negative covariance. Lastly, we demonstrate that time to extinction in our model occurs much more rapidly under a negative covariance.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 450
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Chesson P(2000)Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31 343-366
[2]  
Durrett R(1998)Spatial aspects of interspecific competition Theor Popul Biol 53 30-43
[3]  
Levin S(2001)Rock–scissors–paper and the survival of the weakest Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268 1323-1327
[4]  
Frean M(1932)Experimental studies on the struggle for existence I. Mixed population of two species of yeast J Exp Biol 9 389-402
[5]  
Abraham ER(1991)Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition J Ecol 79 1013-1030
[6]  
Gause GF(1999)Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos Nature 402 407-410
[7]  
Goldberg DE(2001)Fundamental unpredictability in multispecies competition Am Nat 157 488-494
[8]  
Landa K(2002)Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors Nature 418 171-174
[9]  
Huisman J(2008)Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks Ecology 89 237-247
[10]  
Weissing FJ(2015)Competitive intransitivity, population interaction structure, and strategy coexistence J Theor Biol 365 149-158